Tokyo University of Foreign Studies
Impact in
- Language and Linguistics top 5%
- EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Linguistics and Language top 5%
- Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Papers in
-
- Linguistic Variation and Morphology 40
- Multilingual Education and Policy 17
-
- Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation 27
- EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning 19
- Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies 17
- Top scholars
- Mark PetersonYounghee SheenRod EllisHide TakashimaMihoko MurakamiRobert R. RatcliffeYukio TonoAlison Stewart
- Journals
- Scientific Reports (3 papers)International Journal of Lexicography (3 papers)Journal of the International Phonetic Association (3 papers)Journal of East Asian Linguistics (3 papers)AILA Review (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Tokyo University of Foreign Studies
338 papers receiving 4.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 223
- Language and Linguistics 1.1k
- Linguistics and Language 358
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 648
- Literature and Literary Theory 522
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 456
Countries citing scholars working at Tokyo University of Foreign Studies
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Tokyo University of Foreign Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Tokyo University of Foreign Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tokyo University of Foreign Studies more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Tokyo University of Foreign Studies
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Tokyo University of Foreign Studies at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Tokyo University of Foreign Studies at the time of their publication.
About Tokyo University of Foreign Studies
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Tokyo University of Foreign Studies have published 450 papers, which have received a total of 5.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 55 papers in Linguistics and Language, 84 papers in Language and Linguistics, 40 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 21 papers in Cultural Studies and 51 papers in Political Science and International Relations on the topics of Linguistic Variation and Morphology (40 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (27 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (26 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (25 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (19 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (17 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (17 papers) and Islamic Studies and History (14 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Language and Linguistics (1.1k citations), Linguistics and Language (358 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (648 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (522 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (456 citations). Authors at Tokyo University of Foreign Studies collaborate with scholars in Japan, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including Scientific Reports, International Journal of Lexicography, Journal of the International Phonetic Association, Journal of East Asian Linguistics and AILA Review. Some of Tokyo University of Foreign Studies's most productive authors include Mark Peterson, Younghee Sheen, Rod Ellis, Hide Takashima, Mihoko Murakami, Robert R. Ratcliffe, Yukio Tono, Alison Stewart, Shoichiro Koide and Yasuo Kuniyoshi.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.