National Institute of Japanese Literature
Impact in
- Radiation top 10%
- Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
- Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
- Linguistics and Language top 10%
Papers in
- Top scholars
- Mang YeTadashi NomotoBo DuHirohiko TsujiiTakahiro KamadaTadashi KamadaWenke HuangYūji Matsumoto
- Journals
- Journal of Radiation Research (11 papers)Radiation Protection Dosimetry (5 papers)Medical Physics (5 papers)Radiotherapy and Oncology (4 papers)Metrologia (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
National Institute of Japanese Literature
275 papers receiving 4.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 202
- Radiation 511
- Linguistics and Language 157
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 701
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 894
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 610
Countries citing scholars working at National Institute of Japanese Literature
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Institute of Japanese Literature. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Institute of Japanese Literature with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Institute of Japanese Literature more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Institute of Japanese Literature
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Institute of Japanese Literature at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Institute of Japanese Literature at the time of their publication.
About National Institute of Japanese Literature
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Institute of Japanese Literature have published 326 papers, which have received a total of 5.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 24 papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 10 papers in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, 23 papers in Radiation, 50 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and 9 papers in Computer Science Applications on the topics of Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (22 papers), Topic Modeling (19 papers), Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (15 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (15 papers), Multimedia Communication and Technology (14 papers), Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (14 papers), Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques (13 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (12 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Radiation (511 citations), Linguistics and Language (157 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (701 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (894 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (610 citations). Authors at National Institute of Japanese Literature collaborate with scholars in Japan, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Radiation Research, Radiation Protection Dosimetry, Medical Physics, Radiotherapy and Oncology and Metrologia. Some of National Institute of Japanese Literature's most productive authors include Mang Ye, Tadashi Nomoto, Bo Du, Hirohiko Tsujii, Takahiro Kamada, Tadashi Kamada, Wenke Huang, Yūji Matsumoto, Emi Nishina and Tsutomu Oohashi.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.