International Journal of Lexicography

11.9k citations
696 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Lexicography and Language Studies
    • linguistics and terminology studies
    • Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
    • Natural Language Processing Techniques
    • Topic Modeling
    • Semantic Web and Ontologies

Papers in

    • Lexicography and Language Studies 547
    • linguistics and terminology studies 186
    • Historical Linguistics and Language Studies 120
    • Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity 66
    • Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies 54
    • Translation Studies and Practices 41

International Journal of Lexicography

542 papers receiving 8.9k citations

Peers

International Journal of Lexicography
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
  • Language and Linguistics 6.5k
  • Artificial Intelligence 7.4k
  • Linguistics and Language 717
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 1.8k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 904
Replace Literary and Linguistic Computing with:
Literary and Linguistic Computing United Kingdom
Assessing Writing United States
Journal of Quantitative Linguistics China
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics United Kingdom
Studia Linguistica United States
ITL Review of Applied Linguistics Belgium
Language Assessment Quarterly United States
Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching China
Pragmatics & Cognition United States
Target International Journal of Translation Studies United Kingdom
International Journal of Lexicography relative to Literary and Linguistic Computing United Kingdom Literary and Linguistic Computing's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Literary and Linguistic Computing · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in International Journal of Lexicography

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of Lexicography. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of Lexicography with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of Lexicography more than expected).

Fields of papers published in International Journal of Lexicography

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of Lexicography. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of Lexicography.

About International Journal of Lexicography

The 696 papers published in International Journal of Lexicography in the last decades have received a total of 11.9k indexed citations . Papers published in International Journal of Lexicography usually cover Language and Linguistics (603 papers), Linguistics and Language (56 papers), Artificial Intelligence (262 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (68 papers) and Communication (17 papers) specifically the topics of Lexicography and Language Studies (547 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (241 papers), linguistics and terminology studies (186 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (120 papers), Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity (66 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (63 papers), Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies (54 papers) and Translation Studies and Practices (41 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Journal of Lexicography are Christiane Fellbaum, George A. Miller, Katherine Miller, Richard Beckwith, Charles J. Fillmore, Gilles-Maurice de Schryver, Robert Lew, Adam Kilgarriff, Patrick Hanks and Anna Dziemianko.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact