Transport for London
Impact in
- Transportation top 0.5%
- Transportation Planning and Optimization
- Urban Transport and Accessibility
- Automotive Engineering top 5%
- Transportation and Mobility Innovations
- Vehicle emissions and performance
Papers in
- Transportation 453
- Transportation Planning and Optimization 331
- Urban Transport and Accessibility 236
-
- Transportation and Mobility Innovations 105
- Vehicle emissions and performance 79
- Top scholars
- Robert B. NolandDaniel Joseph GrahamJoyce DargayWashington Yotto OchiengJohn W. PolakMohammed Abdul QuddusP. A. B. RaffleDavid Metz
- Journals
- Transport Reviews (37 papers)Accident Analysis & Prevention (30 papers)Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice (30 papers)Transportation (25 papers)Transportation Research Part B Methodological (24 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomChinaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Transport for London
1.0k papers receiving 32.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 223
- Transportation 14.1k
- Automotive Engineering 6.0k
- Building and Construction 5.9k
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 3.3k
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 1.8k
Countries citing scholars working at Transport for London
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Transport for London. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Transport for London with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Transport for London more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Transport for London
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Transport for London at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Transport for London at the time of their publication.
About Transport for London
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Transport for London have published 1.1k papers, which have received a total of 35.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 453 papers in Transportation, 228 papers in Automotive Engineering, 214 papers in Building and Construction, 111 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and 44 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology on the topics of Transportation Planning and Optimization (331 papers), Urban Transport and Accessibility (236 papers), Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques (117 papers), Transportation and Mobility Innovations (105 papers), Traffic control and management (104 papers), Traffic and Road Safety (102 papers), Vehicle emissions and performance (79 papers) and Urban and Freight Transport Logistics (52 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Transportation (14.1k citations), Automotive Engineering (6.0k citations), Building and Construction (5.9k citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (3.3k citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (1.8k citations). Authors at Transport for London collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, China and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Transport Reviews, Accident Analysis & Prevention, Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice, Transportation and Transportation Research Part B Methodological. Some of Transport for London's most productive authors include Robert B. Noland, Daniel Joseph Graham, Joyce Dargay, Washington Yotto Ochieng, John W. Polak, Mohammed Abdul Quddus, P. A. B. Raffle, David Metz, J.N. Morris and Michael Bell.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.