Office Of Health Economics
Impact in
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
- Healthcare Policy and Management
- Economic and Environmental Valuation
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Healthcare cost, quality, practices
- Global Health Care Issues
Papers in
-
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 303
- Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy 105
- Healthcare Policy and Management 84
- Economic and Environmental Valuation 34
- Top scholars
- Nancy DevlinAdrian TowseDavid A. KingKoonal ShahYan FengRichard BrooksDavid ParkinBen van Hout
- Journals
- Value in Health (102 papers)PharmacoEconomics (31 papers)Health Economics (25 papers)The European Journal of Health Economics (22 papers)Applied Health Economics and Health Policy (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Office Of Health Economics
478 papers receiving 13.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 213
- Economics and Econometrics 7.6k
- General Health Professions 2.3k
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 515
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 199
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 107
Countries citing scholars working at Office Of Health Economics
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Office Of Health Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Office Of Health Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Office Of Health Economics more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Office Of Health Economics
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Office Of Health Economics at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Office Of Health Economics at the time of their publication.
About Office Of Health Economics
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Office Of Health Economics have published 634 papers, which have received a total of 17.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 372 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 10 papers in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 115 papers in General Health Professions, 1 paper in Medical Terminology and 25 papers in Health on the topics of Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (303 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (105 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (84 papers), Global Health Care Issues (53 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (34 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (34 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (19 papers) and Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (15 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Economics and Econometrics (7.6k citations), General Health Professions (2.3k citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (515 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (199 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (107 citations). Authors at Office Of Health Economics collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands and have published in prestigious journals including Value in Health, PharmacoEconomics, Health Economics, The European Journal of Health Economics and Applied Health Economics and Health Policy. Some of Office Of Health Economics's most productive authors include Nancy Devlin, Adrian Towse, David A. King, Koonal Shah, Yan Feng, Richard Brooks, David Parkin, Ben van Hout, Brendan Mulhern and Louis P. Garrison.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.