Thüringer Aufbaubank

6.2k citations
303 papers ·

Impact in

    • Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices
    • Semiconductor materials and devices
    • Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
    • Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
    • MXene and MAX Phase Materials
    • Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
    • Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides

Papers in

Thüringer Aufbaubank

198 papers receiving 5.6k citations

Peers

Thüringer Aufbaubank
Comparison fields: 5 of 215
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 3.2k
  • Materials Chemistry 2.3k
  • Toxicology 68
  • Immunology and Allergy 98
  • Pollution 157
Replace Diamant (Germany) with:
Diamant (Germany) Germany
Koninklijk Nederlands Genootschap voor Fysiotherapie Netherlands
Fondazione Filarete Italy
Anton Proksch Institut Austria
Beilstein-Institut Germany
Boiron (France) France
Vienna Institute for Nature Conservation & Analyses Austria
Freiberger Compound Materials (Germany) Germany
Hohenstein Institute Germany
Tate & Lyle (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Thüringer Aufbaubank relative to Diamant (Germany) Germany Diamant (Germany)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10.2×
Diamant (Germany) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Thüringer Aufbaubank

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Thüringer Aufbaubank. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Thüringer Aufbaubank with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thüringer Aufbaubank more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Thüringer Aufbaubank

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Thüringer Aufbaubank at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Thüringer Aufbaubank at the time of their publication.

About Thüringer Aufbaubank

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Thüringer Aufbaubank have published 303 papers, which have received a total of 6.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 4 papers in Toxicology, 8 papers in Communication, 8 papers in Emergency Medicine, 4 papers in Ecological Modeling and 5 papers in Religious studies on the topics of Sociology and Education Studies (14 papers), Medical and Health Sciences Research (11 papers), Health and Medical Studies (8 papers), Education Methods and Technologies (7 papers), Poisoning and overdose treatments (7 papers), Media Studies and Communication (7 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (6 papers) and German Literature and Culture Studies (6 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (3.2k citations), Materials Chemistry (2.3k citations), Toxicology (68 citations), Immunology and Allergy (98 citations) and Pollution (157 citations). Authors at Thüringer Aufbaubank collaborate with scholars in Germany, Switzerland and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Clinical Toxicology, Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte, JDDG Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft, Applied Physics Letters and Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. Some of Thüringer Aufbaubank's most productive authors include U. Schröder, Tim S. Böscke, D. Bräuhaus, Johannes Müller, U. Böttger, Gerhard Gramss, Thomas Mikolajick, Jonas Sundqvist, P. Kücher and L. Frey.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact