Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 0.05%
- Astro and Planetary Science
- Planetary Science and Exploration
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
- Atmospheric Science top 0.1%
Papers in
-
- Astro and Planetary Science 5.7k
- Planetary Science and Exploration 5.3k
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 1.8k
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 1.5k
- Instrumentation 1.5k
- Top scholars
- Eric J. RignotR. KwokBruce Tsatnam TsurutaniM.K. SimonPeter H. SiegelJ. W. LaylandC. L. LiuEdward J. Smith
- Journals
- The Astrophysical Journal (2.5k papers)Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (2k papers)Geophysical Research Letters (1.8k papers)Icarus (1.7k papers)The Astronomical Journal (840 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
58k papers receiving 2.2M citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 250
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 825.1k
- Atmospheric Science 215.1k
- Global and Planetary Change 187.1k
- Oceanography 98k
- Instrumentation 21.4k
Countries citing scholars working at Jet Propulsion Laboratory
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Jet Propulsion Laboratory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Jet Propulsion Laboratory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jet Propulsion Laboratory more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Jet Propulsion Laboratory
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Jet Propulsion Laboratory at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Jet Propulsion Laboratory at the time of their publication.
About Jet Propulsion Laboratory
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Jet Propulsion Laboratory have published 60.5k papers, which have received a total of 2.2M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 19.9k papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1.5k papers in Instrumentation, 107 papers in Nuclear Energy and Engineering, 12k papers in Aerospace Engineering and 4.4k papers in Atmospheric Science on the topics of Astro and Planetary Science (5.7k papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (5.3k papers), Spacecraft Design and Technology (3.1k papers), Spacecraft Dynamics and Control (2.5k papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (1.9k papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (1.8k papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (1.5k papers) and Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (1.5k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Astronomy and Astrophysics (825.1k citations), Atmospheric Science (215.1k citations), Global and Planetary Change (187.1k citations), Oceanography (98k citations) and Instrumentation (21.4k citations). Authors at Jet Propulsion Laboratory collaborate with scholars in United States, France and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including The Astrophysical Journal, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Geophysical Research Letters, Icarus and The Astronomical Journal. Some of Jet Propulsion Laboratory's most productive authors include Eric J. Rignot, R. Kwok, Bruce Tsatnam Tsurutani, M.K. Simon, Peter H. Siegel, J. W. Layland, C. L. Liu, Edward J. Smith, Howard A. Zebker and R. M. Goldstein.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.