Silva

586 papers receiving 15.1k citations

Peers

Silva
Comparison fields: 5 of 174
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 5.2k
  • Global and Planetary Change 8.3k
  • Atmospheric Science 3.5k
  • Soil Science 1.5k
  • Ecological Modeling 636
Replace Office National des Forêts with:
Office National des Forêts France
Nordwestdeutsche Forstliche Versuchsanstalt Germany
Physique et Physiologie Intégratives de l'Arbre en Environnement Fluctuant France
Écologie des Forêts Méditerranéennes France
Federal Agency for Nature Conservation Germany
Ecologie et Dynamique des Systèmes Anthropisés France
Laboratoire d'Ecophysiologie des Plantes sous Stress environnementaux France
EMMAH - Environnement Méditerranéen et Modélisation des Agro-Hydrosystèmes France
Forstliche Versuchs- und Forschungsanstalt Baden-Württemberg Germany
Interaction Sol Plante Atmosphère France
Silva relative to Office National des Forêts France Office National des Forêts's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Office National des Forêts · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Silva

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Silva. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Silva with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Silva more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Silva

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Silva at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Silva at the time of their publication.

About Silva

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Silva have published 642 papers, which have received a total of 15.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 259 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 354 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 148 papers in Atmospheric Science, 32 papers in Ecological Modeling and 21 papers in Forestry on the topics of Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (253 papers), Forest ecology and management (159 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (119 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (108 papers), Forest Management and Policy (57 papers), Plant responses to elevated CO2 (45 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (45 papers) and Tree Root and Stability Studies (41 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (5.2k citations), Global and Planetary Change (8.3k citations), Atmospheric Science (3.5k citations), Soil Science (1.5k citations) and Ecological Modeling (636 citations). Authors at Silva collaborate with scholars in France, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Annals of Forest Science, Forest Ecology and Management, Tree Physiology, New Phytologist and Journal of Experimental Botany. Some of Silva's most productive authors include Daniel Epron, Damien Bonal, Matthias Cuntz, Nicolas Marron, Nathalie Bréda, I still have a question on alternate names : I have two very wrong alternate names "GARNIER‐GÉRÉ, Pauline" "Le Thiec, Didier" ; Pauline only turns up in one common publication in my list https://api.openalex.org/w4302973150 , coming from this HAL record and all affiliations seem correct. No other wrong publications in my list (at least not with Paulines name). So something went rather wrong here, Erwin Dreyer, Éric Dufrêne, Jean‐Luc Dupouey and Didier Le Thiec.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact