EIC Laboratories

19.8k citations
403 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

EIC Laboratories

388 papers receiving 19.5k citations

Peers

EIC Laboratories
Comparison fields: 5 of 181
  • Polymers and Plastics 4.8k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 5.1k
  • Automotive Engineering 2.9k
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 11.9k
  • Electrochemistry 777
Replace Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies with:
Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies United States
Materials Research Group (United States) United States
Metal Matrix Cast Composites (United States) United States
Division of Materials Research United States
Buffalo BioLabs United States
Center for Functional Nanomaterials United States
Naval Research Laboratory Chemistry Division United States
Arsenal Medical (United States) United States
ECSI Fibrotools (United States) United States
Altria (United States) United States
EIC Laboratories relative to Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies United States Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at EIC Laboratories

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at EIC Laboratories. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at EIC Laboratories with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites EIC Laboratories more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at EIC Laboratories

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with EIC Laboratories at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with EIC Laboratories at the time of their publication.

About EIC Laboratories

In recent decades, authors affiliated with EIC Laboratories have published 403 papers, which have received a total of 19.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 98 papers in Polymers and Plastics, 30 papers in Electrochemistry, 85 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 25 papers in Bioengineering and 223 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering on the topics of Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (84 papers), Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies (78 papers), Advancements in Battery Materials (67 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (58 papers), Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (42 papers), Advanced Battery Technologies Research (41 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (36 papers) and Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials (34 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Polymers and Plastics (4.8k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (5.1k citations), Automotive Engineering (2.9k citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (11.9k citations) and Electrochemistry (777 citations). Authors at EIC Laboratories collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Electrochimica Acta, Journal of Power Sources, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering and Applied Physics Letters. Some of EIC Laboratories's most productive authors include K. M. Abraham, Stuart F. Cogan, R. D. Rauh, Zong‐Pei Jiang, S. B. Brummer, M. Alamgir, Michael Wilson, Lois S. Robblee, Timothy L. Rose and Undurti N. Das.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact