EIC Laboratories

20.0k citations
386 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

EIC Laboratories

375 papers receiving 19.8k citations

Peers

EIC Laboratories
Comparison fields: 5 of 168
  • Polymers and Plastics 5.0k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 5.6k
  • Automotive Engineering 2.8k
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 12.1k
  • Electrochemistry 819
Replace Materials Research Group (United States) with:
Materials Research Group (United States) United States
Division of Materials Research United States
Kyocera (United States) United States
Buffalo BioLabs United States
Naval Research Laboratory Chemistry Division United States
Center for Functional Nanomaterials United States
Arsenal Medical (United States) United States
Virginia BioTechnology Research Park United States
American Chemical Society United States
Unilever (United States) United States
EIC Laboratories relative to Materials Research Group (United States) United States Materials Research Group (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×25.6×
Materials Research Group (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at EIC Laboratories

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at EIC Laboratories. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at EIC Laboratories with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites EIC Laboratories more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at EIC Laboratories

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with EIC Laboratories at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with EIC Laboratories at the time of their publication.

About EIC Laboratories

In recent decades, authors affiliated with EIC Laboratories have published 386 papers, which have received a total of 20.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 95 papers in Polymers and Plastics, 28 papers in Bioengineering, 30 papers in Electrochemistry, 87 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 221 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering on the topics of Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (86 papers), Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies (74 papers), Advancements in Battery Materials (63 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (58 papers), Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (44 papers), Advanced Battery Technologies Research (39 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (39 papers) and Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials (36 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Polymers and Plastics (5.0k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (5.6k citations), Automotive Engineering (2.8k citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (12.1k citations) and Electrochemistry (819 citations). Authors at EIC Laboratories collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Journal of Power Sources, Electrochimica Acta, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering and Applied Physics Letters. Some of EIC Laboratories's most productive authors include K. M. Abraham, Stuart F. Cogan, Zong‐Pei Jiang, R. D. Rauh, S. Barry Brummer, Muhammad Khalid Alamgir, Michael S J Wilson, Timothy L. Rose, Lois S. Robblee and Mary Jane Turner.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact