Seabrook

23.9k citations
691 papers ·

Impact in

    • Astro and Planetary Science
    • Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
    • Planetary Science and Exploration
    • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
    • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
    • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols

Papers in

Seabrook

630 papers receiving 23.4k citations

Peers

Seabrook
Comparison fields: 5 of 210
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 5.8k
  • Atmospheric Science 6.2k
  • Global and Planetary Change 5.3k
  • Oceanography 1.9k
  • Instrumentation 489
Replace Applied Research Corporation (United States) with:
Applied Research Corporation (United States) United States
Planetary Systems (United States) United States
Global Science & Technology (United States) United States
Department of Terrestrial Magnetism United States
Technology Service Corporation (United States) United States
Joint Space Science Institute United States
NOAA National Geodetic Survey United States
Sigma Space (United States) United States
Northeast Radio Observatory Corporation United States
G & A Technical Software (United States) United States
Seabrook relative to Applied Research Corporation (United States) United States Applied Research Corporation (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Applied Research Corporation (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Seabrook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Seabrook. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Seabrook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Seabrook more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Seabrook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Seabrook at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Seabrook at the time of their publication.

About Seabrook

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Seabrook have published 691 papers, which have received a total of 23.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 214 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 34 papers in Instrumentation, 142 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 50 papers in Oceanography and 68 papers in Atmospheric Science on the topics of Astro and Planetary Science (80 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (69 papers), Radiation Effects in Electronics (48 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (47 papers), Spacecraft Design and Technology (46 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (42 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (37 papers) and Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (35 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Astronomy and Astrophysics (5.8k citations), Atmospheric Science (6.2k citations), Global and Planetary Change (5.3k citations), Oceanography (1.9k citations) and Instrumentation (489 citations). Authors at Seabrook collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including The Astrophysical Journal, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Geophysical Research Letters and The Astronomical Journal. Some of Seabrook's most productive authors include Malcolm MacCoss, Alastair D. G. Lawson, Richard D. Taylor, Stephen E. Cohn, Baode Chen, Xiaodong Liu, M.D. Shuster, F. Landis Markley, E. J. Lefferts and Steven C. Sherwood.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact