National Geographic Society

25.5k citations
512 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

National Geographic Society

501 papers receiving 25.5k citations

Peers

National Geographic Society
Comparison fields: 5 of 203
  • Ecology 7.4k
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 3.2k
  • Global and Planetary Change 5.3k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 2.4k
  • Oceanography 2.5k
Replace National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center with:
National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center United States
Maryland Department of Natural Resources United States
National Audubon Society United States
Stroud Water Research Center United States
University System of Maryland United States
NCCOS Hollings Marine Laboratory United States
South Carolina Department of Natural Resources United States
New England Aquarium United States
NASA Earth Science United States
Cooperative Institute for Great Lakes Research United States
National Geographic Society relative to National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center United States National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.7×
National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Geographic Society

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Geographic Society. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Geographic Society with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Geographic Society more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Geographic Society

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Geographic Society at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Geographic Society at the time of their publication.

About National Geographic Society

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Geographic Society have published 512 papers, which have received a total of 25.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 181 papers in Ecology, 67 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 62 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, 103 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 53 papers in Oceanography on the topics of Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (110 papers), Marine and fisheries research (70 papers), Coastal and Marine Management (54 papers), Ichthyology and Marine Biology (49 papers), Marine Biology and Ecology Research (34 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (34 papers), Marine animal studies overview (26 papers) and Cryospheric studies and observations (17 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecology (7.4k citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (3.2k citations), Global and Planetary Change (5.3k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.4k citations) and Oceanography (2.5k citations). Authors at National Geographic Society collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports, Science, Frontiers in Marine Science and PeerJ. Some of National Geographic Society's most productive authors include Enric Sala, Alan M. Friedlander, Enric Ballesteros, Sylvaine Giakoumi, Greg Marshall, Kyler Abernathy, Michael R. Heithaus, JONATHAN E. M. BAILLIE, Stuart A. Sandin and Christopher Costello.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact