South Australian Research and Development Institute

2.9k papers receiving 88.0k citations

Peers

South Australian Research and Development Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 231
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 9.8k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 10.5k
  • Aquatic Science 5.9k
  • Ecology 20.2k
  • Plant Science 28.0k
Replace Animal, Food and Health Sciences with:
Animal, Food and Health Sciences Australia
Agriculture Victoria Australia
Australian Wine Research Institute Australia
Ecosystem Sciences Australia
Plant Industry Australia
AgriBio Australia
Parks and Wildlife Service Australia
Wagga Wagga Base Hospital Australia
Department of Primary Industries Australia
Poultry CRC Australia
South Australian Research and Development Institute relative to Animal, Food and Health Sciences Australia Animal, Food and Health Sciences's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.5×
Animal, Food and Health Sciences · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at South Australian Research and Development Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at South Australian Research and Development Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at South Australian Research and Development Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites South Australian Research and Development Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at South Australian Research and Development Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with South Australian Research and Development Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with South Australian Research and Development Institute at the time of their publication.

About South Australian Research and Development Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with South Australian Research and Development Institute have published 3.1k papers, which have received a total of 90.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 392 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 407 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 236 papers in Aquatic Science, 657 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 676 papers in Ecology on the topics of Marine and fisheries research (397 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (306 papers), Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (219 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (173 papers), Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (158 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (153 papers), Marine animal studies overview (152 papers) and Horticultural and Viticultural Research (150 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Agronomy and Crop Science (9.8k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (10.5k citations), Aquatic Science (5.9k citations), Ecology (20.2k citations) and Plant Science (28.0k citations). Authors at South Australian Research and Development Institute collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and New Zealand and have published in prestigious journals including Field Crops Research, Animal Production Science, Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, Crop and Pasture Science and Aquaculture. Some of South Australian Research and Development Institute's most productive authors include Víctor O. Sadras, Corey J. A. Bradshaw, Barry W. Brook, Navjot S. Sodhi, Robert Hughes, Jason E. Tanner, Michael McCarthy, Robert J. Moore, Laurent Seuront and Dragana Stanley.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact