Ecosystem Sciences

156.4k citations
4.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Ecosystem Sciences

3.9k papers receiving 154.6k citations

Peers

Ecosystem Sciences
Comparison fields: 5 of 239
  • Ecological Modeling 15.1k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 32.7k
  • Global and Planetary Change 44.0k
  • Ecology 44.9k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 27.7k
Replace CSIRO Land and Water with:
CSIRO Land and Water Australia
ACT Government Australia
Environmental Earth Sciences Australia
New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Australia
CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere Australia
Plant Industry Australia
Agriculture and Food Australia
Royal Botanic Garden Sydney Australia
Bureau of Meteorology Australia
South Australian Research and Development Institute Australia
Ecosystem Sciences relative to CSIRO Land and Water Australia CSIRO Land and Water's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
CSIRO Land and Water · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Ecosystem Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Ecosystem Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Ecosystem Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ecosystem Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Ecosystem Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Ecosystem Sciences at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Ecosystem Sciences at the time of their publication.

About Ecosystem Sciences

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Ecosystem Sciences have published 4.2k papers, which have received a total of 156.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 349 papers in Ecological Modeling, 895 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 1.0k papers in Global and Planetary Change, 1.2k papers in Ecology and 708 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics on the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (599 papers), Plant and animal studies (358 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (349 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (321 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (267 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (191 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (185 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (182 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (15.1k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (32.7k citations), Global and Planetary Change (44.0k citations), Ecology (44.9k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (27.7k citations). Authors at Ecosystem Sciences collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Zootaxa, Austral Ecology, Biological Conservation and Forest Ecology and Management. Some of Ecosystem Sciences's most productive authors include Alan N. Andersen, Tara G. Martin, Hugh P. Possingham, David M. Eissenstat, David A. Westcott, Nadine Marshall, Kenneth G. Cassman, Brett A. Bryan, Benjamin D. Hoffmann and Garry D. Cook.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact