Australian Wine Research Institute

2.5k papers receiving 107.8k citations

Peers

Australian Wine Research Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 218
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 6.6k
  • Food Science 46.6k
  • Biochemistry 13.7k
  • Plant Science 60.1k
  • Biotechnology 6.3k
Replace South Australian Research and Development Institute with:
South Australian Research and Development Institute Australia
Animal, Food and Health Sciences Australia
Agriculture Victoria Australia
AgriBio Australia
ARC Centre of Excellence for Plant Success in Nature and Agriculture Australia
Poultry CRC Australia
Department of Primary Industries Australia
ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology Australia
Riddet Institute New Zealand
Cawthron Institute New Zealand
Australian Wine Research Institute relative to South Australian Research and Development Institute Australia South Australian Research and Development Institute's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×29.8×
South Australian Research and Development Institute · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Australian Wine Research Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Australian Wine Research Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Australian Wine Research Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Australian Wine Research Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Australian Wine Research Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Australian Wine Research Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Australian Wine Research Institute at the time of their publication.

About Australian Wine Research Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Australian Wine Research Institute have published 2.6k papers, which have received a total of 111.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 174 papers in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, 1.0k papers in Food Science, 1.5k papers in Plant Science, 216 papers in Biochemistry and 142 papers in Soil Science on the topics of Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (951 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (699 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (209 papers), Wine Industry and Tourism (174 papers), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (110 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (105 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (104 papers) and Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (100 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (6.6k citations), Food Science (46.6k citations), Biochemistry (13.7k citations), Plant Science (60.1k citations) and Biotechnology (6.3k citations). Authors at Australian Wine Research Institute collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Food Chemistry, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture and Crop and Pasture Science. Some of Australian Wine Research Institute's most productive authors include Isak S. Pretorius, Paul A. Henschke, Daniel Cozzolino, I. Leigh Francis, Eveline Bartowsky, Paul A. Smith, Mark A. Sefton, Cristián Varela, T. C. Somers and Elizabeth J. Waters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact