Field Crops Research

7.0k papers and 305.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 7.0k papers published in Field Crops Research in the last decades have received a total of 305.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Field Crops Research usually cover Plant Science (5.7k papers), Agronomy and Crop Science (3.0k papers) and Soil Science (1.9k papers) specifically the topics of Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (1.8k papers), Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement (1.5k papers) and Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (1.2k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Field Crops Research are Víctor O. Sadras, Gustavo A. Slafer, S. Fukai, R.C. Muchow, A. Blum, Fernando H. Andrade, David J. Connor, María E. Otegui, Kenneth G. Cassman and L. T. Evans.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Field Crops Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Field Crops Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Field Crops Research.

Countries where authors publish in Field Crops Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Field Crops Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Field Crops Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Field Crops Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025