RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research
Impact in
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Papers in
-
- Labor market dynamics and wage inequality 177
- Economic and Environmental Valuation 91
- Climate Change Policy and Economics 88
- Top scholars
- Jochen KluveManuel FrondelChristoph Μ. SchmidtColin VanceJörg PetersThomas BauerJohn P. Haisken‐DeNewHendrik Schmitz
- Journals
- Health Economics (27 papers)Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik (23 papers)Energy Policy (17 papers)Journal of Health Economics (16 papers)Labour Economics (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research
1.3k papers receiving 23.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 227
- Economics and Econometrics 9.5k
- Business and International Management 505
- Pollution 2.2k
- Energy Engineering and Power Technology 567
- Management of Technology and Innovation 1.1k
Countries citing scholars working at RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the time of their publication.
About RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research
In recent decades, authors affiliated with RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research have published 1.4k papers, which have received a total of 23.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 749 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 114 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 179 papers in Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, 31 papers in Public Administration and 84 papers in Gender Studies on the topics of Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (177 papers), Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies (148 papers), Energy and Environment Impacts (92 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (91 papers), Climate Change Policy and Economics (88 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (86 papers), Global Health Care Issues (85 papers) and Migration and Labor Dynamics (81 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Economics and Econometrics (9.5k citations), Business and International Management (505 citations), Pollution (2.2k citations), Energy Engineering and Power Technology (567 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (1.1k citations). Authors at RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research collaborate with scholars in Germany, United Kingdom and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Health Economics, Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, Energy Policy, Journal of Health Economics and Labour Economics. Some of RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research's most productive authors include Jochen Kluve, Manuel Frondel, Christoph Μ. Schmidt, Colin Vance, Jörg Peters, Thomas Bauer, John P. Haisken‐DeNew, Hendrik Schmitz, Friederike Welter and Mark Andor.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.