RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research
Impact in
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Papers in
-
- Labor market dynamics and wage inequality 182
- Economic and Environmental Valuation 94
- Climate Change Policy and Economics 91
- Top scholars
- Jochen KluveManuel FrondelChristoph Μ. SchmidtColin VanceJörg PetersThomas BauerFriederike WelterJohn P. Haisken‐DeNew
- Journals
- Health Economics (27 papers)Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik (25 papers)Energy Policy (18 papers)Journal of Health Economics (16 papers)Labour Economics (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research
1.3k papers receiving 25.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 228
- Economics and Econometrics 10.1k
- Business and International Management 554
- Pollution 2.4k
- Energy Engineering and Power Technology 602
- General Health Professions 3.8k
Countries citing scholars working at RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the time of their publication.
About RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research
In recent decades, authors affiliated with RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research have published 1.6k papers, which have received a total of 27.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 798 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 125 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 188 papers in Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, 223 papers in General Health Professions and 86 papers in Gender Studies on the topics of Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (182 papers), Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies (154 papers), Energy and Environment Impacts (95 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (94 papers), Global Health Care Issues (93 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (92 papers), Climate Change Policy and Economics (91 papers) and Migration and Labor Dynamics (85 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Economics and Econometrics (10.1k citations), Business and International Management (554 citations), Pollution (2.4k citations), Energy Engineering and Power Technology (602 citations) and General Health Professions (3.8k citations). Authors at RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research collaborate with scholars in Germany, United Kingdom and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Health Economics, Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, Energy Policy, Journal of Health Economics and Labour Economics. Some of RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research's most productive authors include Jochen Kluve, Manuel Frondel, Christoph Μ. Schmidt, Colin Vance, Jörg Peters, Thomas Bauer, Friederike Welter, John P. Haisken‐DeNew, Hendrik Schmitz and Mark Andor.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.