International Institute of Social History
Impact in
-
- Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Urban Studies top 2%
Papers in
-
- Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development 118
-
- Labor Movements and Unions 39
- Top scholars
- Joyeeta GuptaSaturnino M. BorrasJan Luiten van ZandenManuel B. AalbersMindi SchneiderLuca BertoliniMarcel van der LindenBen White
- Journals
- International Review of Social History (51 papers)Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie (23 papers)Third World Quarterly (21 papers)The History of the Family (18 papers)International Labor and Working-Class History (17 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
International Institute of Social History
1.3k papers receiving 28.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 224
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3.5k
- Urban Studies 1.5k
- Business and International Management 446
- Sociology and Political Science 9.2k
- Economics and Econometrics 5.2k
Countries citing scholars working at International Institute of Social History
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at International Institute of Social History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at International Institute of Social History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Institute of Social History more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at International Institute of Social History
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with International Institute of Social History at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with International Institute of Social History at the time of their publication.
About International Institute of Social History
In recent decades, authors affiliated with International Institute of Social History have published 1.6k papers, which have received a total of 31.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 148 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 53 papers in Public Administration, 126 papers in Anthropology, 555 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 45 papers in Development on the topics of Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (118 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (115 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (65 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (47 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (47 papers), International Development and Aid (45 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (40 papers) and Labor Movements and Unions (39 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (3.5k citations), Urban Studies (1.5k citations), Business and International Management (446 citations), Sociology and Political Science (9.2k citations) and Economics and Econometrics (5.2k citations). Authors at International Institute of Social History collaborate with scholars in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States and have published in prestigious journals including International Review of Social History, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Third World Quarterly, The History of the Family and International Labor and Working-Class History. Some of International Institute of Social History's most productive authors include Joyeeta Gupta, Saturnino M. Borras, Jan Luiten van Zanden, Manuel B. Aalbers, Mindi Schneider, Luca Bertolini, Marcel van der Linden, Ben White, Syed Mansoob Murshed and Marco te Brömmelstroet.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.