Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory

53.8k citations
1.0k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory

978 papers receiving 52.2k citations

Peers

Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory
Comparison fields: 5 of 217
  • Ecological Modeling 7.4k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 32.0k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 18.6k
  • Insect Science 7.6k
  • Ecology 12.7k
Replace Fort Collins Science Center with:
Fort Collins Science Center United States
Colorado Parks and Wildlife United States
National Wildlife Research Center United States
Southwest Biological Science Center United States
Oklahoma Biological Survey United States
Agricultural Research Service - Plains Area United States
Integra (United States) United States
Zoological Society of San Diego United States
National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis United States
Houston Museum of Natural Science United States
Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory relative to Fort Collins Science Center United States Fort Collins Science Center's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Fort Collins Science Center · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory at the time of their publication.

About Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory have published 1.0k papers, which have received a total of 53.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 641 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 357 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 116 papers in Ecological Modeling, 34 papers in Developmental Biology and 262 papers in Ecology on the topics of Plant and animal studies (482 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (296 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (169 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (152 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (116 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (87 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (74 papers) and Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology (66 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (7.4k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (32.0k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (18.6k citations), Insect Science (7.6k citations) and Ecology (12.7k citations). Authors at Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Oecologia, American Journal of Botany, Ecology, Evolution and Animal Behaviour. Some of Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory's most productive authors include David W. Inouye, Nickolas M. Waser, Diane R. Campbell, Mary V. Price, James D. Thomson, Ward B. Watt, Rebecca E. Irwin, Barbara L. Peckarsky, Carol L. Boggs and Alison K. Brody.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact