Houston Museum of Natural Science

48.1k citations
1.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Houston Museum of Natural Science

1.3k papers receiving 46.2k citations

Peers

Houston Museum of Natural Science
Comparison fields: 5 of 205
  • Ecological Modeling 6.8k
  • Paleontology 8.9k
  • Developmental Biology 1.9k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 10.5k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 15.1k
Replace Oklahoma Biological Survey with:
Oklahoma Biological Survey United States
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department United States
Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries United States
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission United States
Evolutionary Genomics (United States) United States
Museum of Boulder United States
Fort Hays State University United States
Mote Marine Laboratory United States
Colorado Parks and Wildlife United States
Chicago Zoological Society United States
Houston Museum of Natural Science relative to Oklahoma Biological Survey United States Oklahoma Biological Survey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Oklahoma Biological Survey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Houston Museum of Natural Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Houston Museum of Natural Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Houston Museum of Natural Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Houston Museum of Natural Science more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Houston Museum of Natural Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Houston Museum of Natural Science at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Houston Museum of Natural Science at the time of their publication.

About Houston Museum of Natural Science

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Houston Museum of Natural Science have published 1.4k papers, which have received a total of 48.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 241 papers in Ecological Modeling, 289 papers in Paleontology, 338 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 453 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 46 papers in Developmental Biology on the topics of Genetic diversity and population structure (422 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (241 papers), Evolution and Paleontology Studies (223 papers), Plant and animal studies (200 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (197 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (163 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (161 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (158 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (6.8k citations), Paleontology (8.9k citations), Developmental Biology (1.9k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (10.5k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (15.1k citations). Authors at Houston Museum of Natural Science collaborate with scholars in United States, Brazil and Taiwan and have published in prestigious journals including The Auk, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Ornithological Applications, Journal of Mammalogy and Zootaxa. Some of Houston Museum of Natural Science's most productive authors include Robb T. Brumfield, Brant C. Faircloth, J. V. Remsen, Mark S. Hafner, Robert M. Zink, John E. McCormack, Travis C. Glenn, Shannon J. Hackett, Prosanta Chakrabarty and Jacob A. Esselstyn.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact