National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis
Impact in
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 0.5%
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Ecological Modeling top 1%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
Papers in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 255
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 52
- Top scholars
- Benjamin S. HalpernBrad H. McRaeFiorenza MicheliTimothy H. KeittCarrie V. KappelKarl CottenieJohn AlroyEric W. Seabloom
- Journals
- Ecology (71 papers)PLoS ONE (52 papers)Ecology Letters (49 papers)Conservation Biology (40 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (38 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis
1.2k papers receiving 191.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 228
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 40.6k
- Ecological Modeling 8.1k
- Ecology 52k
- Global and Planetary Change 42.4k
- Oceanography 14.8k
Countries citing scholars working at National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis at the time of their publication.
About National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis have published 1.3k papers, which have received a total of 191.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 285 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 52 papers in Ecological Modeling, 362 papers in Ecology, 316 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 183 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law on the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (255 papers), Coastal and Marine Management (131 papers), Marine and fisheries research (127 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (105 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models (82 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (56 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (52 papers) and Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (50 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (40.6k citations), Ecological Modeling (8.1k citations), Ecology (52k citations), Global and Planetary Change (42.4k citations) and Oceanography (14.8k citations). Authors at National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Ecology, PLoS ONE, Ecology Letters, Conservation Biology and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Some of National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis's most productive authors include Benjamin S. Halpern, Brad H. McRae, Fiorenza Micheli, Timothy H. Keitt, Carrie V. Kappel, Karl Cottenie, John Alroy, Eric W. Seabloom, Mark Vellend and Elsa E. Cleland.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.