National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 0.5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 185
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 267
- Top scholars
- Benjamin S. HalpernBrad H. McRaeTimothy H. KeittFiorenza MicheliJohn AlroyCarrie V. KappelEric W. SeabloomMark Vellend
- Journals
- Ecology (80 papers)PLoS ONE (50 papers)Ecological Applications (40 papers)Ecology Letters (39 papers)Conservation Biology (37 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis
1.2k papers receiving 169.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 235
- Ecological Modeling 21.8k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 50.0k
- Ecology 82.9k
- Global and Planetary Change 62.5k
- Oceanography 22.0k
Countries citing scholars working at National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis at the time of their publication.
About National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis have published 1.2k papers, which have received a total of 174.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 185 papers in Ecological Modeling, 355 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 614 papers in Ecology, 457 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 149 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law on the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (267 papers), Marine and fisheries research (212 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (200 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (185 papers), Plant and animal studies (167 papers), Coastal and Marine Management (113 papers), Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (105 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (99 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (21.8k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (50.0k citations), Ecology (82.9k citations), Global and Planetary Change (62.5k citations) and Oceanography (22.0k citations). Authors at National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Ecology, PLoS ONE, Ecological Applications, Ecology Letters and Conservation Biology. Some of National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis's most productive authors include Benjamin S. Halpern, Brad H. McRae, Timothy H. Keitt, Fiorenza Micheli, John Alroy, Carrie V. Kappel, Eric W. Seabloom, Mark Vellend, Elsa E. Cleland and Sandy J. Andelman.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.