Colorado Parks and Wildlife

9.7k citations
531 papers ·

Impact in

  • Ecology top 10%
    • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
    • Rangeland and Wildlife Management
    • Avian ecology and behavior
    • Species Distribution and Climate Change

Papers in

Colorado Parks and Wildlife

491 papers receiving 9.7k citations

Peers

Colorado Parks and Wildlife
Comparison fields: 5 of 163
  • Ecology 5.3k
  • Ecological Modeling 376
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1k
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 801
  • Global and Planetary Change 417
Replace Wyoming Game and Fish Department with:
Wyoming Game and Fish Department United States
Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
Agricultural Research Service - Plains Area United States
Yellowstone National Park
National Ecological Observatory Network United States
Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health United States
Arizona Game and Fish Department United States
Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center
Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks United States
The Peregrine Fund United States
Colorado Parks and Wildlife relative to Wyoming Game and Fish Department United States Wyoming Game and Fish Department's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.9×
Wyoming Game and Fish Department · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Colorado Parks and Wildlife

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Colorado Parks and Wildlife. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Colorado Parks and Wildlife with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colorado Parks and Wildlife more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Colorado Parks and Wildlife

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Colorado Parks and Wildlife at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Colorado Parks and Wildlife at the time of their publication.

About Colorado Parks and Wildlife

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Colorado Parks and Wildlife have published 531 papers, which have received a total of 9.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 263 papers in Ecology, 88 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 12 papers in Ecological Modeling, 37 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and 8 papers in Physiology on the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (147 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (81 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (55 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (52 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (26 papers), Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (22 papers), Myxozoan Parasites in Aquatic Species (16 papers) and Mercury impact and mitigation studies (15 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecology (5.3k citations), Ecological Modeling (376 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (1k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (801 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (417 citations). Authors at Colorado Parks and Wildlife collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Wildlife Diseases, Journal of Wildlife Management, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, PLoS ONE and Ecosphere. Some of Colorado Parks and Wildlife's most productive authors include Charles R. Anderson, Mevin B. Hooten, Mathew W. Alldredge, Jacob S. Ivan, Joseph M. Northrup, George Wittemyer, Stewart W. Breck, Heather E. Johnson, Jesse M. Lepak and Pete Cadmus.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact