Rochester Institute of Technology
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 2%
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Instrumentation top 2%
Papers in
- Media Technology 945
- Remote-Sensing Image Classification 383
- Architecture 134
- Top scholars
- Satish G. KandlikarFerat SahinAmitrajeet A. BatabyalDavid R. MerrittKristin ByronMark D. FairchildSandra L. RothenbergAshok J. Robin
- Journals
- The Astrophysical Journal (222 papers)Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (143 papers)Color Research & Application (117 papers)The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education (108 papers)Physical review. D (68 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomChina
In The Last Decade
Rochester Institute of Technology
15.4k papers receiving 347.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 32.0k
- Instrumentation 5.9k
- Human-Computer Interaction 8.2k
- Media Technology 10.6k
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 24.2k
Countries citing scholars working at Rochester Institute of Technology
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Rochester Institute of Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Rochester Institute of Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rochester Institute of Technology more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Rochester Institute of Technology
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Rochester Institute of Technology at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Rochester Institute of Technology at the time of their publication.
About Rochester Institute of Technology
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Rochester Institute of Technology have published 17.5k papers, which have received a total of 365.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 945 papers in Media Technology, 134 papers in Architecture, 504 papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 410 papers in Computer Science Applications and 1.5k papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition on the topics of Hearing Impairment and Communication (526 papers), Color Science and Applications (476 papers), Remote-Sensing Image Classification (383 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (362 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (350 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (334 papers), Software Engineering Research (322 papers) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (299 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Astronomy and Astrophysics (32.0k citations), Instrumentation (5.9k citations), Human-Computer Interaction (8.2k citations), Media Technology (10.6k citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (24.2k citations). Authors at Rochester Institute of Technology collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and China and have published in prestigious journals including The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Color Research & Application, The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education and Physical review. D. Some of Rochester Institute of Technology's most productive authors include Satish G. Kandlikar, Ferat Sahin, Amitrajeet A. Batabyal, David R. Merritt, Kristin Byron, Mark D. Fairchild, Sandra L. Rothenberg, Ashok J. Robin, Christopher Kanan and Gabrielle G. Gaustad.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.