Royal Horticultural Society

7.3k citations
287 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Royal Horticultural Society

271 papers receiving 7.3k citations

Peers

Royal Horticultural Society
Comparison fields: 5 of 166
  • Pollution 814
  • Soil Science 825
  • Environmental Engineering 732
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 747
  • Plant Science 2k
Replace Forestry Commission England with:
Forestry Commission England United Kingdom
Flemish Community Belgium
Writtle University College United Kingdom
Federal Agency for Nature Conservation Germany
Federal Office for the Environment Switzerland
Institute of Life, Earth and Environment
PatriNat France
ECT Oekotoxikologie (Germany) Germany
Maison de la Recherche en Sciences Humaines France
Biologie et Ecologie des Ecosystèmes Marins Profonds France
Royal Horticultural Society relative to Forestry Commission England United Kingdom Forestry Commission England's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.7×
Forestry Commission England · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Royal Horticultural Society

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Royal Horticultural Society. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Royal Horticultural Society with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Royal Horticultural Society more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Royal Horticultural Society

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Royal Horticultural Society at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Royal Horticultural Society at the time of their publication.

About Royal Horticultural Society

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Royal Horticultural Society have published 287 papers, which have received a total of 7.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 55 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 96 papers in Plant Science, 30 papers in Cell Biology, 21 papers in Insect Science and 24 papers in Soil Science on the topics of Plant Diversity and Evolution (33 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (30 papers), Plant Pathogens and Resistance (17 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (15 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (15 papers), Powdery Mildew Fungal Diseases (14 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (14 papers) and Linguistic and Cultural Studies (12 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Pollution (814 citations), Soil Science (825 citations), Environmental Engineering (732 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (747 citations) and Plant Science (2k citations). Authors at Royal Horticultural Society collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including Plant Pathology, Taxon, Plant Disease, Mycologia and Urban forestry & urban greening. Some of Royal Horticultural Society's most productive authors include Tijana Blanuša, P.D. Alexander, B. Henricot, Ross W. F. Cameron, Marc A. Redmile-Gordon, Neil C. Bragg, Andrew Salisbury, Brian John Alloway, Anna Dourado and Ken A. Thompson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact