Urban forestry & urban greening

3.1k papers and 101.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.1k papers published in Urban forestry & urban greening in the last decades have received a total of 101.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Urban forestry & urban greening usually cover Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (2.3k papers), Global and Planetary Change (1.6k papers) and Environmental Engineering (1.0k papers) specifically the topics of Urban Green Space and Health (2.2k papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (1.4k papers) and Urban Heat Island Mitigation (884 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Urban forestry & urban greening are David J. Nowak, Cecil C. Konijnendijk, Daniel E. Crane, C.Y. Jim, Abdullah Akpınar, Jack C. Stevens, Jason Byrne, Christine Haaland, Arne Arnberger and Patrik Grahn.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Urban forestry & urban greening

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Urban forestry & urban greening. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Urban forestry & urban greening.

Countries where authors publish in Urban forestry & urban greening

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Urban forestry & urban greening. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Urban forestry & urban greening with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Urban forestry & urban greening more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025