Federal Office for the Environment
Impact in
- Speech and Hearing top 5%
- Noise Effects and Management
- Pollution top 10%
- Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
- Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Papers in
-
- Noise Effects and Management 53
-
- Landslides and related hazards 26
- Top scholars
- Mark BrinkLiliana B. AndonovaJean Marc WunderliMartin RöösliDanielle VienneauLuuk K.A. DorrenLuiz Felippe De AlencastroNicole M Probst-Hensch
- Journals
- International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (12 papers)SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series (11 papers)Environment International (11 papers)Chemosphere (8 papers)The Science of The Total Environment (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandGermanyFrance
In The Last Decade
Federal Office for the Environment
370 papers receiving 13.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 184
- Speech and Hearing 1.8k
- Pollution 1.8k
- Environmental Chemistry 875
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 1.1k
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 1.1k
Countries citing scholars working at Federal Office for the Environment
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Federal Office for the Environment. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Federal Office for the Environment with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Federal Office for the Environment more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Federal Office for the Environment
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Federal Office for the Environment at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Federal Office for the Environment at the time of their publication.
About Federal Office for the Environment
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Federal Office for the Environment have published 385 papers, which have received a total of 13.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 53 papers in Speech and Hearing, 34 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, 37 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, 52 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 29 papers in Pollution on the topics of Noise Effects and Management (53 papers), Landslides and related hazards (26 papers), Forest Management and Policy (21 papers), Vehicle emissions and performance (15 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (14 papers), Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (14 papers), Engine and Fuel Emissions (12 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (12 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Speech and Hearing (1.8k citations), Pollution (1.8k citations), Environmental Chemistry (875 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (1.1k citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (1.1k citations). Authors at Federal Office for the Environment collaborate with scholars in Switzerland, Germany and France and have published in prestigious journals including International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Environment International, Chemosphere and The Science of The Total Environment. Some of Federal Office for the Environment's most productive authors include Mark Brink, Liliana B. Andonova, Jean Marc Wunderli, Martin Röösli, Danielle Vienneau, Luuk K.A. Dorren, Luiz Felippe De Alencastro, Nicole M Probst-Hensch, Frédéric Berger and Reto Pieren.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.