Royal Academy of Engineering
Impact in
-
- Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
-
- Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
Papers in
-
- Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis 5
- Top scholars
- Emílio CustódioAndrew ChilversAdisa AzapagicHarish Kumar JeswaniBrian B. SheilEric C. KerriganStéphane BordasJ.M. Maciejowski
- Journals
- Engineering (3 papers)Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering (3 papers)International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering (3 papers)Nature (3 papers)Process Safety and Environmental Protection (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSpain
In The Last Decade
Royal Academy of Engineering
212 papers receiving 6.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 216
- Civil and Structural Engineering 807
- Geochemistry and Petrology 202
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 300
- Mechanics of Materials 763
- Building and Construction 398
Countries citing scholars working at Royal Academy of Engineering
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Royal Academy of Engineering. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Royal Academy of Engineering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Royal Academy of Engineering more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Royal Academy of Engineering
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Royal Academy of Engineering at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Royal Academy of Engineering at the time of their publication.
About Royal Academy of Engineering
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Royal Academy of Engineering have published 251 papers, which have received a total of 6.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2 papers in Nuclear Energy and Engineering, 12 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, 2 papers in Architecture, 11 papers in Media Technology and 26 papers in Civil and Structural Engineering on the topics of Combustion and flame dynamics (9 papers), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (7 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures (7 papers), Numerical methods in engineering (6 papers), Fault Detection and Control Systems (5 papers), Advanced Control Systems Optimization (5 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis (5 papers) and Fatigue and fracture mechanics (5 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Civil and Structural Engineering (807 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (202 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (300 citations), Mechanics of Materials (763 citations) and Building and Construction (398 citations). Authors at Royal Academy of Engineering collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Spain and have published in prestigious journals including Engineering, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Nature and Process Safety and Environmental Protection. Some of Royal Academy of Engineering's most productive authors include Emílio Custódio, Andrew Chilvers, Adisa Azapagic, Harish Kumar Jeswani, Brian B. Sheil, Eric C. Kerrigan, Stéphane Bordas, J.M. Maciejowski, K. Glover and Richard Alden Hyde.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.