Save the Elephants

13.1k citations
472 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies 68
    • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 227
    • Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation 37
    • Marine animal studies overview 26

Save the Elephants

412 papers receiving 12.6k citations

Peers

Save the Elephants
Comparison fields: 5 of 216
  • Developmental Biology 1.4k
  • Small Animals 2.4k
  • Ecology 8.1k
  • Ecological Modeling 720
  • Social Psychology 3.2k
Replace Mpala Research Center and Wildlife Foundation with:
Mpala Research Center and Wildlife Foundation Kenya
Tanzania Fisheries Research Institute Tanzania
Université de Mahajanga Madagascar
Wildlife Conservation Society Congo Republic of the Congo
Centre National de la Recherche Appliquée au Developpement Rural Madagascar
Madagascar Biodiversity Partnership Madagascar
University of Seychelles Seychelles
Endangered Wildlife Trust South Africa
National Zoological Gardens of South Africa South Africa
Institut Africain d'Informatique Gabon
Save the Elephants relative to Mpala Research Center and Wildlife Foundation Kenya Mpala Research Center and Wildlife Foundation's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Mpala Research Center and Wildlife Foundation · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Save the Elephants

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Save the Elephants. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Save the Elephants with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Save the Elephants more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Save the Elephants

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Save the Elephants at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Save the Elephants at the time of their publication.

About Save the Elephants

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Save the Elephants have published 472 papers, which have received a total of 13.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 74 papers in Small Animals, 256 papers in Ecology, 21 papers in Developmental Biology, 97 papers in Social Psychology and 53 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law on the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (227 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (91 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (68 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (50 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (45 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (44 papers), Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation (37 papers) and Marine animal studies overview (26 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Developmental Biology (1.4k citations), Small Animals (2.4k citations), Ecology (8.1k citations), Ecological Modeling (720 citations) and Social Psychology (3.2k citations). Authors at Save the Elephants collaborate with scholars in Kenya, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Animal Behaviour, Medicine, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Some of Save the Elephants's most productive authors include George Wittemyer, Iain Douglas‐Hamilton, Cynthia J. Moss, Fritz Vollrath, Susan C. Alberts, Wayne M. Getz, Phyllis C. Lee, Elizabeth A. Archie, Joyce H. Poole and Karen McComb.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact