Physicians for Human Rights

5.8k citations
355 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Physicians for Human Rights

264 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Peers

Physicians for Human Rights
Comparison fields: 5 of 175
  • General Health Professions 1.6k
  • Clinical Psychology 1.3k
  • Health 377
  • Gender Studies 415
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.9k
Replace Council on Foreign Relations with:
Council on Foreign Relations United States
Africa Center United States
The White House United States
Public Citizen United States
Concern Worldwide US United States
International Rescue Committee United States
Office of the Secretary of Health and Human Services United States
Academy for Educational Development United States
Somerset Medical Center United States
Equality Now United States
Physicians for Human Rights relative to Council on Foreign Relations United States Council on Foreign Relations's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.5×
Council on Foreign Relations · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Physicians for Human Rights

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Physicians for Human Rights. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Physicians for Human Rights with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Physicians for Human Rights more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Physicians for Human Rights

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Physicians for Human Rights at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Physicians for Human Rights at the time of their publication.

About Physicians for Human Rights

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Physicians for Human Rights have published 355 papers, which have received a total of 5.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 108 papers in General Health Professions, 1 paper in Medical Terminology, 70 papers in Clinical Psychology, 123 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 14 papers in Emergency Medical Services on the topics of Health and Conflict Studies (68 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (63 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (51 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (33 papers), Human Rights and Development (22 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (14 papers), International Law and Human Rights (13 papers) and Global Maternal and Child Health (11 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Health Professions (1.6k citations), Clinical Psychology (1.3k citations), Health (377 citations), Gender Studies (415 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (1.9k citations). Authors at Physicians for Human Rights collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including The Lancet, Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, JAMA, Contraception and International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. Some of Physicians for Human Rights's most productive authors include Lynn L. Amowitz, Vincent Iacopino, Michele Heisler, Paul Gready, Simon P. Robins, Sheri D. Weiser, Karen Leiter, Ranit Mishori, Nthabiseng Phaladze and David R. Bangsberg.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact