Office of Inspector General

193 papers receiving 5.2k citations

Peers

Office of Inspector General
Comparison fields: 5 of 218
  • Health Information Management 192
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 544
  • Oncology 853
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 604
  • Chemical Health and Safety 13
Replace McKing Consulting (United States) with:
McKing Consulting (United States) United States
Schulman, Ronca & Bucuvalas United States
Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health Canada
Statistics Collaborative United States
National Public Radio United States
Clinical Research Consulting United States
Government of the District of Columbia United States
Rex Hospital United States
American Thoracic Society United States
Adventist HealthCare United States
Office of Inspector General relative to McKing Consulting (United States) United States McKing Consulting (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.7×
McKing Consulting (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Office of Inspector General

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Office of Inspector General. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Office of Inspector General with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Office of Inspector General more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Office of Inspector General

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Office of Inspector General at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Office of Inspector General at the time of their publication.

About Office of Inspector General

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Office of Inspector General have published 270 papers, which have received a total of 6.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 5 papers in Health Information Management, 1 paper in Archeology, 3 papers in Public Administration, 4 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and 19 papers in General Health Professions on the topics of Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (6 papers), French Urban and Social Studies (6 papers), Occupational and environmental lung diseases (5 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (5 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (5 papers), Social Policies and Family (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (4 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health Information Management (192 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (544 citations), Oncology (853 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (604 citations) and Chemical Health and Safety (13 citations). Authors at Office of Inspector General collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands and have published in prestigious journals including Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Australian Veterinary Journal, Journal of the Society of Dyers and Colourists, Occupational Medicine and New England Journal of Medicine. Some of Office of Inspector General's most productive authors include Limin X. Clegg, Ram C. Tiwari, David C. Hsia, Brenda K. Edwards, Benjamin F. Hankey, Eric J. Feuer, Zhaohui Zou, W. Mark Krushat, Richard Carmona and Alan E. Guttmacher.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact