Oregon Department of Education

48.5k citations
1.3k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Oregon Department of Education

1.1k papers receiving 43.7k citations

Peers

Oregon Department of Education
Comparison fields: 5 of 237
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 11.5k
  • Clinical Psychology 12.2k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 7.4k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 8.4k
  • Social Psychology 9.1k
Replace Eugene Research Institute with:
Eugene Research Institute United States
Oregon Social Learning Center United States
Institute for Learning Innovation United States
Western Oregon University United States
Pacific Lutheran University United States
Langley Porter Psychiatric Hospital and Clinics United States
Pacific University Oregon United States
City University of Seattle United States
Behavioral Tech United States
Wested United States
Oregon Department of Education relative to Eugene Research Institute United States Eugene Research Institute's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Eugene Research Institute · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Oregon Department of Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Oregon Department of Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Oregon Department of Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oregon Department of Education more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Oregon Department of Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Oregon Department of Education at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Oregon Department of Education at the time of their publication.

About Oregon Department of Education

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Oregon Department of Education have published 1.3k papers, which have received a total of 48.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 306 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 346 papers in Clinical Psychology, 387 papers in Education, 109 papers in Safety Research and 184 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience on the topics of Behavioral and Psychological Studies (164 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (156 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (137 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (128 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (90 papers), Disability Education and Employment (73 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (63 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (62 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Developmental and Educational Psychology (11.5k citations), Clinical Psychology (12.2k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (7.4k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (8.4k citations) and Social Psychology (9.1k citations). Authors at Oregon Department of Education collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Behavioral Disorders, Journal of Learning Disabilities, Journal of Behavioral Education, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders and Journal of Child and Family Studies. Some of Oregon Department of Education's most productive authors include Ronald A. Beghetto, James C. Kaufman, Mary K. Rothbart, Robert H. Horner, Vance V. Tammen, Edward McAuley, Terry E. Duncan, Jennifer J. Freyd, Brent Mallinckrodt and Jonathan A. Plucker.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact