National Institute of Nursing Research
Impact in
- Pharmacy top 2%
- Nursing care and research
- Research and Theory top 2%
- Nursing education and management
Papers in
-
- Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership 35
- Pharmacy 46
- Nursing care and research 45
- Top scholars
- Patricia A. GradyNancy Kline LeidyJessica GillLeorey N. SaliganRichard SchulzPaula R. SherwoodLinda H. AikenBrian T. Walitt
- Journals
- Nursing Research (170 papers)The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing (69 papers)Cancer Nursing (40 papers)Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing (37 papers)Nursing Outlook (33 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaSpain
In The Last Decade
National Institute of Nursing Research
1.3k papers receiving 43.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 217
- Pharmacy 2k
- Research and Theory 1.7k
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 539
- Psychiatry and Mental health 3.8k
- Leadership and Management 374
Countries citing scholars working at National Institute of Nursing Research
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Institute of Nursing Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Institute of Nursing Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Institute of Nursing Research more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Institute of Nursing Research
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Institute of Nursing Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Institute of Nursing Research at the time of their publication.
About National Institute of Nursing Research
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Institute of Nursing Research have published 1.3k papers, which have received a total of 43.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 43 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects, 46 papers in Pharmacy, 33 papers in Research and Theory, 164 papers in General Health Professions and 200 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health on the topics of Cancer survivorship and care (119 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (69 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (55 papers), Nursing care and research (45 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (45 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (42 papers), Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (35 papers) and Nursing education and management (33 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Pharmacy (2k citations), Research and Theory (1.7k citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (539 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (3.8k citations) and Leadership and Management (374 citations). Authors at National Institute of Nursing Research collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and Spain and have published in prestigious journals including Nursing Research, The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, Cancer Nursing, Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing and Nursing Outlook. Some of National Institute of Nursing Research's most productive authors include Patricia A. Grady, Nancy Kline Leidy, Jessica Gill, Leorey N. Saligan, Richard Schulz, Paula R. Sherwood, Linda H. Aiken, Brian T. Walitt, Patricia A. Patrician and Lisa Lucio Gough.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.