National Institute of Nursing Research

1.1k papers receiving 42.2k citations

Peers

National Institute of Nursing Research
Comparison fields: 5 of 231
  • Research and Theory 369
  • Biological Psychiatry 971
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 4.4k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 1.1k
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 331
Replace Canadian Institutes of Health Research with:
Canadian Institutes of Health Research Canada
Duke University Health System United States
Unity Health System United States
Chestnut Hill College United States
National Academy of Medicine United States
Institute for Community Health United States
St. Joseph Hospital United States
Office of the Director United States
VA Center for Clinical Management Research United States
Western Pennsylvania Hospital United States
National Institute of Nursing Research relative to Canadian Institutes of Health Research Canada Canadian Institutes of Health Research's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Canadian Institutes of Health Research · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Institute of Nursing Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Institute of Nursing Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Institute of Nursing Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Institute of Nursing Research more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Institute of Nursing Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Institute of Nursing Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Institute of Nursing Research at the time of their publication.

About National Institute of Nursing Research

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Institute of Nursing Research have published 1.4k papers, which have received a total of 52.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 17 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects, 10 papers in Research and Theory, 32 papers in Sensory Systems, 23 papers in Behavioral Neuroscience and 84 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health on the topics of Cancer survivorship and care (58 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (42 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (39 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (36 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (33 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (33 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (27 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (24 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Research and Theory (369 citations), Biological Psychiatry (971 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (4.4k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (1.1k citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (331 citations). Authors at National Institute of Nursing Research collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Nursing Research, The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, Biological Research For Nursing, Nursing Outlook and Journal of Clinical Investigation. Some of National Institute of Nursing Research's most productive authors include Nancy Kline Leidy, Jessica Gill, Leorey N. Saligan, Patricia A. Grady, Brian Walitt, Julia H. Rowland, Lisa Lucio Gough, Noreen M. Aziz, Winfried Häuser and Robert W. Thatcher.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact