Melbourn Science Park

376 papers receiving 12.9k citations

Peers

Melbourn Science Park
Comparison fields: 5 of 216
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 3.1k
  • Structural Biology 134
  • Oncology 1.8k
  • Molecular Biology 4.5k
  • Immunology 1.2k
Replace Dutch Research Council with:
Dutch Research Council Netherlands
Délégation Ile-de-France Villejuif France
Guerbet (France) France
GW Pharmaceuticals (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
North Hertfordshire College United Kingdom
Thermo Fisher Scientific (Germany) Germany
Balfour Beatty (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Fondation ARC pour la Recherche sur le Cancer France
Lawn Tennis Association United Kingdom
Research Institute for Chromatography Belgium
Melbourn Science Park relative to Dutch Research Council Netherlands Dutch Research Council's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.2×
Dutch Research Council · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Melbourn Science Park

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Melbourn Science Park. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Melbourn Science Park with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melbourn Science Park more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Melbourn Science Park

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Melbourn Science Park at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Melbourn Science Park at the time of their publication.

About Melbourn Science Park

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Melbourn Science Park have published 428 papers, which have received a total of 13.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 8 papers in Structural Biology, 33 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 103 papers in Molecular Biology, 8 papers in Biophysics and 22 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics on the topics of Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (33 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (14 papers), Protein purification and stability (14 papers), Phase-change materials and chalcogenides (11 papers), Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (10 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (9 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (9 papers) and Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (9 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (3.1k citations), Structural Biology (134 citations), Oncology (1.8k citations), Molecular Biology (4.5k citations) and Immunology (1.2k citations). Authors at Melbourn Science Park collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Nature Biotechnology, Annals of Oncology, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Immunotechnology. Some of Melbourn Science Park's most productive authors include William Bains, Andrew D. Griffiths, Hennie R. Hoogenboom, Greg Winter, Robert E. Hawkins, Seyed Mohsen Sadeghzadeh, Sara Seager, Leila Khoja, Jane Osbourn and Tristan J. Vaughan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact