National Science Library

7.7k citations
568 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

National Science Library

432 papers receiving 7.2k citations

Peers

National Science Library
Comparison fields: 5 of 219
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 984
  • Environmental Engineering 896
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 373
  • Economics and Econometrics 1.3k
  • Global and Planetary Change 835
Replace Chinese Academy of Governance with:
Chinese Academy of Governance China
National Bureau of Statistics of China China
Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information China
National Development and Reform Commission China
Institute of Quantitative and Technical Economics China
Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics China
Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China China
People's Bank of China China
China University of Labor Relations China
China Development Bank China
National Science Library relative to Chinese Academy of Governance China Chinese Academy of Governance's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Chinese Academy of Governance · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Science Library

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Science Library. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Science Library with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Science Library more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Science Library

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Science Library at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Science Library at the time of their publication.

About National Science Library

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Science Library have published 568 papers, which have received a total of 7.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 72 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 36 papers in Information Systems and Management, 6 papers in Health Informatics, 97 papers in Information Systems and 24 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation on the topics of scientometrics and bibliometrics research (66 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (29 papers), Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (27 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (23 papers), Research Data Management Practices (23 papers), Topic Modeling (21 papers), Energy, Environment, Economic Growth (17 papers) and Data Quality and Management (16 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (984 citations), Environmental Engineering (896 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (373 citations), Economics and Econometrics (1.3k citations) and Global and Planetary Change (835 citations). Authors at National Science Library collaborate with scholars in China, United States and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Scientometrics, Journal of Data and Information Science, Journal of Informetrics, Sustainability and Frontiers in Plant Science. Some of National Science Library's most productive authors include Ronald Rousseau, Liying Yang, Bihui Jin, Fei Teng, Jiangfeng Liu, Liming Liang, Jiansheng Qu, Leo Egghe, Qi Zhang and Siyuan Chen.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact