Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information
Impact in
- General Energy top 1%
- Environmental Engineering top 5%
- Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Papers in
-
- Environmental Impact and Sustainability 137
- Journals
- Forests (46 papers)Applied Energy (24 papers)Energy (23 papers)Energy Policy (23 papers)Sustainability (21 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information
762 papers receiving 27.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 212
- General Energy 942
- Environmental Engineering 7.8k
- Economics and Econometrics 13.5k
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 6.1k
- Management Science and Operations Research 3.8k
Countries citing scholars working at Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information at the time of their publication.
About Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information have published 853 papers, which have received a total of 28.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 27 papers in General Energy, 178 papers in Environmental Engineering, 273 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 150 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 83 papers in Management Science and Operations Research on the topics of Environmental Impact and Sustainability (137 papers), Energy, Environment, Economic Growth (108 papers), Climate Change Policy and Economics (89 papers), Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies (74 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (51 papers), Forest Management and Policy (48 papers), Market Dynamics and Volatility (48 papers) and Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (35 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Energy (942 citations), Environmental Engineering (7.8k citations), Economics and Econometrics (13.5k citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (6.1k citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (3.8k citations). Authors at Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information collaborate with scholars in China, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Forests, Applied Energy, Energy, Energy Policy and Sustainability. Some of Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information's most productive authors include Ying Fan, Yi‐Ming Wei, Qiang Ji, Guo-liang Yang, Ali Emrouznejad, Lei Zhu, Lan-Cui Liu, Gang Wu, Zheng Wang and Jianping Li.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.