China University of Labor Relations

8.5k citations
589 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

China University of Labor Relations

458 papers receiving 7.7k citations

Peers

China University of Labor Relations
Comparison fields: 5 of 218
  • Public Administration 664
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1.3k
  • Gender Studies 926
  • Applied Psychology 263
  • Health Informatics 63
Replace Chinese Academy of Governance with:
Chinese Academy of Governance China
Korea Development Institute South Korea
National Academy of Governance Mongolia
Science and Technology Policy Institute South Korea
Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences China
Institute of Quantitative and Technical Economics China
Korea University of International Studies South Korea
Seoul School of Integrated Sciences and Technologies South Korea
University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences China
Tourism College of Zhejiang China
China University of Labor Relations relative to Chinese Academy of Governance China Chinese Academy of Governance's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.9×
Chinese Academy of Governance · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at China University of Labor Relations

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at China University of Labor Relations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at China University of Labor Relations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites China University of Labor Relations more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at China University of Labor Relations

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with China University of Labor Relations at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with China University of Labor Relations at the time of their publication.

About China University of Labor Relations

In recent decades, authors affiliated with China University of Labor Relations have published 589 papers, which have received a total of 8.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 58 papers in Public Administration, 40 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, 44 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 16 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and 67 papers in Economics and Econometrics on the topics of Labor Movements and Unions (58 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (32 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (20 papers), Fire dynamics and safety research (20 papers), Combustion and Detonation Processes (17 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (16 papers), Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics (16 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (16 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Public Administration (664 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.3k citations), Gender Studies (926 citations), Applied Psychology (263 citations) and Health Informatics (63 citations). Authors at China University of Labor Relations collaborate with scholars in China, United States and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Industrial Relations A Journal of Economy and Society, Advances in Skin & Wound Care, British Journal of Industrial Relations, Relations industrielles and Journal of Organizational Behavior. Some of China University of Labor Relations's most productive authors include Caiming Zhang, Yang Lu, Joseph J. Martocchio, Raymond A. Noe, Yong Chen, John M. Gottman, Theresa M. Glomb, Andrea Foote, John C. Erfurt and Robin J. Ely.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact