Fermi National Accelerator LaboratoryUnited States
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator FacilityUnited States
Energetics (United States)United States
Marshall Space Flight CenterUnited States
Optical Sciences (United States)United States
Princeton Plasma Physics LaboratoryUnited States
General Dynamics (United States)United States
Perimeter InstituteCanada
OpticaUnited States
National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratoryrelative toFusion AcademyUnited StatesFusion Academy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.4×
Fusion Academy · 1×
×1.387k/67kNHEP
×4.420k/5kRADIA
×1.739k/23kAMPO
×0.416k/38kAA
×2.49k/4kSPECT
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries citing scholars working at National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory at the time of their publication.
About National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory have published 3.8k papers, which have received a total of 108.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2.9k papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 1.0k papers in Radiation, 1.4k papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 697 papers in Aerospace Engineering and 336 papers in Spectroscopy on the topics of Nuclear physics research studies (2.5k papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (868 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (855 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (784 papers), Astronomical and nuclear sciences (681 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (418 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (384 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (381 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nuclear and High Energy Physics (87.2k citations), Radiation (20.3k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (39.0k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (16.4k citations) and Spectroscopy (9.5k citations). Authors at National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory collaborate with scholars in United States, Germany and Japan and have published in prestigious journals including Nuclear Physics A, Physical Review Letters, Physics Letters B, Physical review. C and Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. Some of National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory's most productive authors include B. A. Brown, G. F. Bertsch, Paweł Danielewicz, B. H. Wildenthal, W. G. Lynch, M. B. Tsang, Scott Pratt, W. Bauer, M. Thoennessen and Takaharu Otsuka.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact