Perimeter Institute
Impact in
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 0.5%
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 0.5%
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Papers in
-
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics 2.0k
- Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies 581
-
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 1.9k
- Top scholars
- Robert B. MannMaxim PospelovRobert C. MyersRobert W. SpekkensLee SmolinAlex BuchelDavid KubizňákXiao-Gang Wen
- Journals
- Physical review. D (689 papers)Journal of High Energy Physics (586 papers)Physical Review Letters (494 papers)Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (206 papers)Classical and Quantum Gravity (180 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Perimeter Institute
5.2k papers receiving 202.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 209
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 104.5k
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 96.2k
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 48.5k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 72.7k
- Computational Mathematics 1.1k
Countries citing scholars working at Perimeter Institute
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Perimeter Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Perimeter Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Perimeter Institute more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Perimeter Institute
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Perimeter Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Perimeter Institute at the time of their publication.
About Perimeter Institute
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Perimeter Institute have published 5.5k papers, which have received a total of 206.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2.7k papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 2.6k papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1.4k papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, 2.0k papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 34 papers in Computational Mathematics on the topics of Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (2.0k papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (1.9k papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (947 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (790 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (702 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (592 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (581 papers) and Quantum many-body systems (526 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nuclear and High Energy Physics (104.5k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (96.2k citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (48.5k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (72.7k citations) and Computational Mathematics (1.1k citations). Authors at Perimeter Institute collaborate with scholars in Canada, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Physical review. D, Journal of High Energy Physics, Physical Review Letters, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Classical and Quantum Gravity. Some of Perimeter Institute's most productive authors include Robert B. Mann, Maxim Pospelov, Robert C. Myers, Robert W. Spekkens, Lee Smolin, Alex Buchel, David Kubizňák, Xiao-Gang Wen, Vítor Cardoso and Subir Sachdev.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.