Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
Impact in
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 0.2%
- Magnetic confinement fusion research
- Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 0.5%
- Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
- Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Papers in
-
- Magnetic confinement fusion research 6.5k
- Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics 1.6k
-
- Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics 3.3k
- Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics 1.3k
- Top scholars
- N. J. FischJ. M. GreeneMartin D. KruskalR. B. WhiteW. M. TangC. Z. ChengT. S. HahmAllen H. Boozer
- Journals
- Physics of Plasmas (1.3k papers)Nuclear Fusion (1.3k papers)Review of Scientific Instruments (812 papers)Physical Review Letters (574 papers)Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion (397 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyChina
In The Last Decade
Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
9.1k papers receiving 238.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 211
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 170.4k
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 112.9k
- Aerospace Engineering 38.1k
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 17.1k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 41.2k
Countries citing scholars working at Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory at the time of their publication.
About Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory have published 9.6k papers, which have received a total of 242.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 7.0k papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 3.7k papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2.1k papers in Aerospace Engineering, 544 papers in Radiation and 1.5k papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics on the topics of Magnetic confinement fusion research (6.5k papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (3.3k papers), Fusion materials and technologies (1.8k papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (1.7k papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (1.6k papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (1.3k papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (1.3k papers) and Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (1.3k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nuclear and High Energy Physics (170.4k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (112.9k citations), Aerospace Engineering (38.1k citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (17.1k citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (41.2k citations). Authors at Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory collaborate with scholars in United States, Germany and China and have published in prestigious journals including Physics of Plasmas, Nuclear Fusion, Review of Scientific Instruments, Physical Review Letters and Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. Some of Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory's most productive authors include N. J. Fisch, J. M. Greene, Martin D. Kruskal, R. B. White, W. M. Tang, C. Z. Cheng, T. S. Hahm, Allen H. Boozer, P. H. Rutherford and Robert M. Miura.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.