ICAR - National Meat Research Institute

4.3k citations
275 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

ICAR - National Meat Research Institute

255 papers receiving 4.1k citations

Peers

ICAR - National Meat Research Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • Animal Science and Zoology 2.0k
  • Biochemistry 474
  • Food Science 1.2k
  • Insect Science 395
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 460
Replace Bombay Veterinary College with:
Bombay Veterinary College India
Government Vidarbha Institute of Science and Humanities India
Haffkine Institute India
B. V. Patel Pharmaceutical Education and Research Development Centre India
King Institute of Preventive Medicine and Research India
University of Trans-Disciplinary Health Sciences and Technology India
Serum Institute of India (India) India
Ipca Laboratories (India) India
Nanaji Deshmukh Veterinary Science University India
Indian Institute of Natural Resins and Gums India
ICAR - National Meat Research Institute relative to Bombay Veterinary College India Bombay Veterinary College's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.3×
Bombay Veterinary College · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at ICAR - National Meat Research Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at ICAR - National Meat Research Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at ICAR - National Meat Research Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ICAR - National Meat Research Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at ICAR - National Meat Research Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with ICAR - National Meat Research Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with ICAR - National Meat Research Institute at the time of their publication.

About ICAR - National Meat Research Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with ICAR - National Meat Research Institute have published 275 papers, which have received a total of 4.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 99 papers in Animal Science and Zoology, 66 papers in Food Science, 20 papers in Parasitology, 14 papers in Microbiology and 11 papers in Biochemistry on the topics of Meat and Animal Product Quality (84 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (45 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (37 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (18 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (17 papers), Vector-borne infectious diseases (16 papers), Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (14 papers) and Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (14 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Animal Science and Zoology (2.0k citations), Biochemistry (474 citations), Food Science (1.2k citations), Insect Science (395 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (460 citations). Authors at ICAR - National Meat Research Institute collaborate with scholars in India, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Food Science and Technology, Meat Science, Journal of Microbiological Methods, The Indian Journal of Medical Research and Food Chemistry. Some of ICAR - National Meat Research Institute's most productive authors include A. R. Sen, S. Vaithiyanathan, N. Kondaiah, M. Muthukumar, S.K. Mendiratta, Suresh Devatkal, Y. Babji, Sukhadeo B. Barbuddhe, Naveena B. Maheswarappa and G. Kandeepan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact