National Museum of the Philippines

7.9k citations
350 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

National Museum of the Philippines

326 papers receiving 7.9k citations

Peers

National Museum of the Philippines
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Paleontology 1.3k
  • Ecological Modeling 258
  • Global and Planetary Change 2.1k
  • Geography, Planning and Development 618
  • Anthropology 872
Replace Sabah Wildlife Department with:
Sabah Wildlife Department Malaysia
Sabah Forestry Department Malaysia
Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden Hong Kong
VNU Central Institute for Natural Resources and Environmental Studies Vietnam
Forest Department Sarawak Malaysia
University of Southern Mindanao Philippines
Fairy Lake Botanical Garden China
National Fisheries Research and Development Institute Philippines
National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute Laos
Museum of Nature and Human Activities Hyogo Japan
National Museum of the Philippines relative to Sabah Wildlife Department Malaysia Sabah Wildlife Department's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×18.2×
Sabah Wildlife Department · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Museum of the Philippines

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Museum of the Philippines. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Museum of the Philippines with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Museum of the Philippines more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Museum of the Philippines

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Museum of the Philippines at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Museum of the Philippines at the time of their publication.

About National Museum of the Philippines

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Museum of the Philippines have published 350 papers, which have received a total of 7.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 64 papers in Paleontology, 30 papers in Geography, Planning and Development, 60 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 35 papers in Archeology and 38 papers in Anthropology on the topics of Amphibian and Reptile Biology (58 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (46 papers), Evolution and Paleontology Studies (41 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (30 papers), Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (29 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (21 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (21 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (20 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Paleontology (1.3k citations), Ecological Modeling (258 citations), Global and Planetary Change (2.1k citations), Geography, Planning and Development (618 citations) and Anthropology (872 citations). Authors at National Museum of the Philippines collaborate with scholars in Philippines, United States and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Phytotaxa, Zootaxa, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, ZooKeys and Herpetologica. Some of National Museum of the Philippines's most productive authors include Arvin C. Diesmos, Rafe M. Brown, Cameron D. Siler, Eusebio Dizon, Brett R. Scheffers, Stephen E. Williams, David J. Lohman, Philip J. Piper, Charles W. Linkem and Theodore A. Evans.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact