Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden

5.9k citations
293 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden

276 papers receiving 5.9k citations

Peers

Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.2k
  • Ecological Modeling 220
  • Global and Planetary Change 934
  • Soil Science 621
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 742
Replace Fairy Lake Botanical Garden with:
Fairy Lake Botanical Garden China
VNU Central Institute for Natural Resources and Environmental Studies Vietnam
National Museum of the Philippines Philippines
Vietnamese Academy of Forest Sciences
Guangdong Eco-Engineering Polytechnic China
Zhejiang Mariculture Research Institute China
National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute Laos
Royal Forest Department Thailand
Shaanxi Institute of Zoology China
Yunnan Institute of Environmental Sciences China
Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden relative to Fairy Lake Botanical Garden China Fairy Lake Botanical Garden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.7×
Fairy Lake Botanical Garden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden at the time of their publication.

About Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden have published 293 papers, which have received a total of 5.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 54 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 69 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 8 papers in Ecological Modeling, 55 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 31 papers in Genetics on the topics of Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (56 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (47 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (45 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (25 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (22 papers), Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses (22 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (21 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (11 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.2k citations), Ecological Modeling (220 citations), Global and Planetary Change (934 citations), Soil Science (621 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (742 citations). Authors at Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden collaborate with scholars in Hong Kong, China and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Zootaxa, Phytotaxa, Global Ecology and Conservation, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society and Biological Conservation. Some of Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden's most productive authors include Jinlong Zhang, Gunter Alexander Fischer, Yi Zou, Pedro R. Peres‐Neto, Jiangshan Lai, Stephan W. Gale, Jian-Huan Yang, Bosco Pui Lok Chan, Pankaj Kumar and Michael Lau.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact