Sabah Forestry Department

11.7k citations
365 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Sabah Forestry Department

341 papers receiving 11.7k citations

Peers

Sabah Forestry Department
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 3.7k
  • Ecological Modeling 356
  • Ecology 3k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.5k
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.7k
Replace Forest Department Sarawak with:
Forest Department Sarawak Malaysia
Sabah Wildlife Department Malaysia
National Museum of the Philippines Philippines
Philippine Rice Research Institute Philippines
Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden Hong Kong
Wildlife Conservation Society Indonesia Indonesia
Royal Forest Department Thailand
Centre for Remote Imaging, Sensing and Processing Singapore
Vietnamese Academy of Forest Sciences
Southeast Asian Regional Centre for Tropical Biology Indonesia
Sabah Forestry Department relative to Forest Department Sarawak Malaysia Forest Department Sarawak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.6×
Forest Department Sarawak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Sabah Forestry Department

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Sabah Forestry Department. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Sabah Forestry Department with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sabah Forestry Department more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Sabah Forestry Department

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Sabah Forestry Department at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Sabah Forestry Department at the time of their publication.

About Sabah Forestry Department

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Sabah Forestry Department have published 365 papers, which have received a total of 11.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 118 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 74 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 84 papers in Ecology, 7 papers in Ecological Modeling and 24 papers in Insect Science on the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (88 papers), Forest ecology and management (46 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (29 papers), Orthoptera Research and Taxonomy (25 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (24 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (23 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (20 papers) and Plant and animal studies (19 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (3.7k citations), Ecological Modeling (356 citations), Ecology (3k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.5k citations) and Global and Planetary Change (1.7k citations). Authors at Sabah Forestry Department collaborate with scholars in Malaysia, United Kingdom and Japan and have published in prestigious journals including Zootaxa, Forest Ecology and Management, Biotropica, PLoS ONE and Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. Some of Sabah Forestry Department's most productive authors include Chey Vun Khen, Reuben Nilus, Arthur Y. C. Chung, David F. R. P. Burslem, Keith C. Hamer, Robert Cyril Ong, Kanehiro Kitayama, Jane K. Hill, Suzan Benedick and Edgar Clive Turner.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact