National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute
Impact in
- Soil Science top 10%
- Soil erosion and sediment transport
- Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Agricultural Science and Fertilization
-
- Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Papers in
- Soil Science 70
- Soil erosion and sediment transport 25
- Agricultural Science and Fertilization 17
- Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics 16
-
- Agricultural Innovations and Practices 25
- Top scholars
- Christian ValentinJean PoesenYong LiVincent A. M. ChaplotAlain PierretNorbert SilveraOlivier RibolziJean‐Louis Janeau
In The Last Decade
National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute
312 papers receiving 9.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
- Soil Science 3.2k
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 699
- Global and Planetary Change 891
- Plant Science 1.7k
- Agronomy and Crop Science 445
Countries citing scholars working at National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute at the time of their publication.
About National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute have published 324 papers, which have received a total of 9.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 70 papers in Soil Science, 36 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 24 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 85 papers in Plant Science and 7 papers in Forestry on the topics of Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement (47 papers), Soil erosion and sediment transport (25 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (25 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (17 papers), Agricultural Science and Fertilization (17 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (16 papers), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (15 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (13 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Soil Science (3.2k citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (699 citations), Global and Planetary Change (891 citations), Plant Science (1.7k citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (445 citations). Authors at National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute collaborate with scholars in Laos, France and Japan and have published in prestigious journals including Field Crops Research, Plant Production Science, Agricultural Systems, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment and Plant and Soil. Some of National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute's most productive authors include Christian Valentin, Jean Poesen, Yong Li, Vincent A. M. Chaplot, Alain Pierret, Norbert Silvera, Olivier Ribolzi, Jean‐Louis Janeau, Oloth Sengtaheuanghoung and Cornélia Rumpel.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.