National League for Nursing
Impact in
- Research and Theory top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Papers in
-
- Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership 36
- Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation 11
-
- Nursing education and management 31
- Top scholars
- Robert A. SteerAaron T. BeckMichael T. KaneLeah L. CurtinRobert L. BrennanBeverly MaloneJanice M. PhillipsKathy Kaufman
- Journals
- Nursing Education Perspectives (52 papers)Nurse Educator (14 papers)Teaching and learning in nursing (12 papers)Nursing Outlook (7 papers)JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomChina
In The Last Decade
National League for Nursing
197 papers receiving 12.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 185
- Research and Theory 316
- Clinical Psychology 5.0k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2.9k
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 177
- Applied Psychology 547
Countries citing scholars working at National League for Nursing
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National League for Nursing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National League for Nursing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National League for Nursing more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National League for Nursing
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National League for Nursing at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National League for Nursing at the time of their publication.
About National League for Nursing
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National League for Nursing have published 324 papers, which have received a total of 14.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 45 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects, 31 papers in Research and Theory, 24 papers in Emergency Medical Services, 56 papers in General Health Professions and 2 papers in Family Practice on the topics of Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (36 papers), Nursing education and management (31 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (25 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (15 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (15 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (14 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (11 papers) and Cultural Competency in Health Care (10 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Research and Theory (316 citations), Clinical Psychology (5.0k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (2.9k citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (177 citations) and Applied Psychology (547 citations). Authors at National League for Nursing collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and China and have published in prestigious journals including Nursing Education Perspectives, Nurse Educator, Teaching and learning in nursing, Nursing Outlook and JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. Some of National League for Nursing's most productive authors include Robert A. Steer, Aaron T. Beck, Michael T. Kane, Leah L. Curtin, Robert L. Brennan, Beverly Malone, Janice M. Phillips, Kathy Kaufman, John C. Vaughn and Nan Lin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.