Wellesley Centers for Women

11.1k citations
257 papers ·

Impact in

    • Gender Diversity and Inequality
    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
    • Child Abuse and Trauma

Papers in

Wellesley Centers for Women

224 papers receiving 9.7k citations

Peers

Wellesley Centers for Women
Comparison fields: 5 of 173
  • Gender Studies 2.0k
  • Clinical Psychology 3.8k
  • Health 1.2k
  • Social Psychology 1.8k
  • Applied Psychology 381
Replace Judge Baker Children's Center with:
Judge Baker Children's Center United States
Sage Colleges United States
Bank Street College of Education United States
National Institute of Justice United States
Applied Behavioral Research (United States) United States
Ontario Centre of Excellence for Child and Youth Mental Health Canada
National Center for Victims of Crime United States
Institute For Community Research United States
Foundation for Child Development United States
Pennsylvania Department of Education United States
Wellesley Centers for Women relative to Judge Baker Children's Center United States Judge Baker Children's Center's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
Judge Baker Children's Center · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Wellesley Centers for Women

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Wellesley Centers for Women. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Wellesley Centers for Women with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wellesley Centers for Women more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Wellesley Centers for Women

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Wellesley Centers for Women at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Wellesley Centers for Women at the time of their publication.

About Wellesley Centers for Women

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Wellesley Centers for Women have published 257 papers, which have received a total of 11.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 81 papers in Clinical Psychology, 38 papers in Gender Studies, 17 papers in Applied Psychology, 20 papers in Safety Research and 52 papers in General Health Professions on the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (53 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (28 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (22 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (21 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (19 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (19 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (17 papers) and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (12 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Gender Studies (2.0k citations), Clinical Psychology (3.8k citations), Health (1.2k citations), Social Psychology (1.8k citations) and Applied Psychology (381 citations). Authors at Wellesley Centers for Women collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, The Journal of Early Adolescence, Journal of Adolescent Health and Women & Health. Some of Wellesley Centers for Women's most productive authors include Sumru Erkut, Michelle V. Porche, Linda M. Williams, Tracy R. G. Gladstone, Nan Stein, William R. Beardslee, Linda Charmaraman, Jennifer M. Grossman, David K. Dickinson and Nancy L. Marshall.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact