Nordisk Institut for Kiropraktik og Klinisk Biomekanik
Impact in
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Papers in
- Pharmacology 266
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 266
- Top scholars
- Jan HartvigsenCharlotte Leboeuf‐YdeKirsten Ohm KyvikAlice KongstedLise HestbækRené FejerPeter M. KentHenrik Wulff Christensen
In The Last Decade
Nordisk Institut for Kiropraktik og Klinisk Biomekanik
377 papers receiving 19.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 175
- Pharmacology 11.2k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 2.1k
- Occupational Therapy 593
- Complementary and alternative medicine 770
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 481
Countries citing scholars working at Nordisk Institut for Kiropraktik og Klinisk Biomekanik
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Nordisk Institut for Kiropraktik og Klinisk Biomekanik. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Nordisk Institut for Kiropraktik og Klinisk Biomekanik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nordisk Institut for Kiropraktik og Klinisk Biomekanik more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Nordisk Institut for Kiropraktik og Klinisk Biomekanik
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Nordisk Institut for Kiropraktik og Klinisk Biomekanik at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Nordisk Institut for Kiropraktik og Klinisk Biomekanik at the time of their publication.
About Nordisk Institut for Kiropraktik og Klinisk Biomekanik
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Nordisk Institut for Kiropraktik og Klinisk Biomekanik have published 380 papers, which have received a total of 19.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 266 papers in Pharmacology, 1 paper in Medical Terminology, 22 papers in Complementary and alternative medicine, 11 papers in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation and 31 papers in General Health Professions on the topics of Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (266 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (22 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (22 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (10 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (9 papers), Reliability and Agreement in Measurement (9 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (8 papers) and Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics (8 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Pharmacology (11.2k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (2.1k citations), Occupational Therapy (593 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (770 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (481 citations). Authors at Nordisk Institut for Kiropraktik og Klinisk Biomekanik collaborate with scholars in Denmark, Australia and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, Spine and European Spine Journal. Some of Nordisk Institut for Kiropraktik og Klinisk Biomekanik's most productive authors include Jan Hartvigsen, Charlotte Leboeuf‐Yde, Kirsten Ohm Kyvik, Alice Kongsted, Lise Hestbæk, René Fejer, Peter M. Kent, Henrik Wulff Christensen, J. David Cassidy and Mette Jensen Stochkendahl.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.