National Institute of Justice
Impact in
- Health top 5%
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Child Abuse and Trauma
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Papers in
- Health 39
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence 31
-
- Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies 22
- Top scholars
- Akiva LibermanMark AndersonBethany L. BackesLisa FedinaRobert J. KaminskiJennifer Lynne HolmesPamela K. LattimoreDoris Layton MacKenzie
- Journals
- Violence Against Women (12 papers)Journal of Quantitative Criminology (8 papers)American Journal of Preventive Medicine (7 papers)Journal of Forensic Sciences (6 papers)Criminology & Public Policy (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsraelNetherlands
In The Last Decade
National Institute of Justice
221 papers receiving 8.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 204
- Health 1.7k
- Clinical Psychology 3.3k
- Gender Studies 1.0k
- General Decision Sciences 171
- Sociology and Political Science 4.1k
Countries citing scholars working at National Institute of Justice
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Institute of Justice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Institute of Justice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Institute of Justice more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Institute of Justice
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Institute of Justice at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Institute of Justice at the time of their publication.
About National Institute of Justice
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Institute of Justice have published 259 papers, which have received a total of 9.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 39 papers in Health, 26 papers in Gender Studies, 51 papers in Clinical Psychology, 111 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 42 papers in General Health Professions on the topics of Crime Patterns and Interventions (70 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (58 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (31 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (22 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (20 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (20 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (18 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (18 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health (1.7k citations), Clinical Psychology (3.3k citations), Gender Studies (1.0k citations), General Decision Sciences (171 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (4.1k citations). Authors at National Institute of Justice collaborate with scholars in United States, Israel and Netherlands and have published in prestigious journals including Violence Against Women, Journal of Quantitative Criminology, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Journal of Forensic Sciences and Criminology & Public Policy. Some of National Institute of Justice's most productive authors include Akiva Liberman, Mark Anderson, Bethany L. Backes, Lisa Fedina, Robert J. Kaminski, Jennifer Lynne Holmes, Pamela K. Lattimore, Doris Layton MacKenzie, André B. Rosay and Carrie F. Mulford.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.