National Institute for Biological Standards and Control

167.6k citations
4.0k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

National Institute for Biological Standards and Control

3.8k papers receiving 158.3k citations

Peers

National Institute for Biological Standards and Control
Comparison fields: 5 of 224
  • Microbiology 9.4k
  • Virology 6.8k
  • Infectious Diseases 22.1k
  • Hematology 12.6k
  • Immunology 23.0k
Replace Institut Pasteur de Lille with:
Institut Pasteur de Lille France
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Institute of Cancer Research United Kingdom
Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie Belgium
Pfizer (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Institut Cochin France
Sanofi (France) France
Janssen (Belgium) Belgium
Hôpital Saint-Antoine France
Bicêtre Hospital France
National Institute for Biological Standards and Control relative to Institut Pasteur de Lille France Institut Pasteur de Lille's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.5×
Institut Pasteur de Lille · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Institute for Biological Standards and Control

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Institute for Biological Standards and Control. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Institute for Biological Standards and Control with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Institute for Biological Standards and Control more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Institute for Biological Standards and Control

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Institute for Biological Standards and Control at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Institute for Biological Standards and Control at the time of their publication.

About National Institute for Biological Standards and Control

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Institute for Biological Standards and Control have published 4.0k papers, which have received a total of 167.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 310 papers in Microbiology, 232 papers in Virology, 478 papers in Hematology, 606 papers in Infectious Diseases and 678 papers in Immunology on the topics of Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (390 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (296 papers), Bacterial Infections and Vaccines (267 papers), Viral Infections and Immunology Research (267 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (240 papers), HIV Research and Treatment (211 papers), Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (190 papers) and Platelet Disorders and Treatments (176 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Microbiology (9.4k citations), Virology (6.8k citations), Infectious Diseases (22.1k citations), Hematology (12.6k citations) and Immunology (23.0k citations). Authors at National Institute for Biological Standards and Control collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Vaccine, Biologicals, Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Journal of General Virology and Vox Sanguinis. Some of National Institute for Biological Standards and Control's most productive authors include John M.C. Gutteridge, Barry B. Halliwell, Philip David Minor, Barbara Mulloy, Thomas B. L. Kirkwood, Stephen Poole, Michael J. Corbel, Anthony Meager, John Martin Wood and Robin Thorpe.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact