Cancer Council Victoria

101.5k citations
2.8k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Cancer Council Victoria

2.2k papers receiving 77.9k citations

Peers

Cancer Council Victoria
Comparison fields: 5 of 233
  • Physiology 26.5k
  • Applied Psychology 4.7k
  • Dermatology 5.8k
  • Oncology 14.5k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 11.4k
Replace National Health and Medical Research Council with:
National Health and Medical Research Council Australia
Melbourne Health Australia
Barwon Health Australia
Eastern Health Australia
Diabetes Australia Australia
Monash Institute of Medical Research Australia
Hunter Medical Research Institute Australia
Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research centre Australia
Queen Elizabeth Hospital Australia
South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute Australia
Cancer Council Victoria relative to National Health and Medical Research Council Australia National Health and Medical Research Council's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
National Health and Medical Research Council · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Cancer Council Victoria

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Cancer Council Victoria. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Cancer Council Victoria with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cancer Council Victoria more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Cancer Council Victoria

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Cancer Council Victoria at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Cancer Council Victoria at the time of their publication.

About Cancer Council Victoria

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Cancer Council Victoria have published 2.8k papers, which have received a total of 101.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 672 papers in Physiology, 109 papers in Applied Psychology, 455 papers in Oncology, 116 papers in Dermatology and 313 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health on the topics of Smoking Behavior and Cessation (576 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (130 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (121 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (110 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (104 papers), Skin Protection and Aging (100 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (98 papers) and BRCA gene mutations in cancer (98 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Physiology (26.5k citations), Applied Psychology (4.7k citations), Dermatology (5.8k citations), Oncology (14.5k citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (11.4k citations). Authors at Cancer Council Victoria collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Tobacco Control, The Medical Journal of Australia, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, Nicotine & Tobacco Research and Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. Some of Cancer Council Victoria's most productive authors include Graham G. Giles, Melanie Wakefield, Ron Borland, Dallas R. English, John L. Hopper, Geoffrey T. Fong, Victoria White, Robin Marks, Mohammad Siahpush and Allison Hodge.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact