National Institute on Aging

12.6k papers receiving 939.5k citations

Peers

National Institute on Aging
Comparison fields: 5 of 245
  • Aging 28.9k
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 36.3k
  • Physiology 223.5k
  • Biological Psychiatry 19.5k
  • Neurology 59.4k
Replace Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center with:
Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center United States
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai United States
Duke University Hospital United States
Duke Medical Center United States
Columbia University Irving Medical Center United States
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center United States
National Heart Lung and Blood Institute United States
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School United States
United States Department of Veterans Affairs United States
Veterans Health Administration United States
National Institute on Aging relative to Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center United States Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Institute on Aging

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Institute on Aging. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Institute on Aging with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Institute on Aging more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Institute on Aging

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Institute on Aging at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Institute on Aging at the time of their publication.

About National Institute on Aging

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Institute on Aging have published 14.2k papers, which have received a total of 1.1M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 461 papers in Aging, 381 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology, 2.6k papers in Physiology, 668 papers in Neurology and 1.3k papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience on the topics of DNA Repair Mechanisms (746 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (691 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (587 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (541 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (508 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (483 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (464 papers) and Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (461 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Aging (28.9k citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (36.3k citations), Physiology (223.5k citations), Biological Psychiatry (19.5k citations) and Neurology (59.4k citations). Authors at National Institute on Aging collaborate with scholars in United States, Italy and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including The Journals of Gerontology Series A, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, PLoS ONE, Neurobiology of Aging and Alzheimer s & Dementia. Some of National Institute on Aging's most productive authors include Mark P. Mattson, Luigi Ferrucci, Robert R. McCrae, Paul T. Costa, Jack M. Guralnik, Edward G. Lakatta, John Hardy, Nikki J. Holbrook, Vilhelm A. Bohr and Dennis J. Selkoe.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact